• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荟萃分析显示,与腹式根治性子宫切除术相比,微创根治性子宫切除术的术中泌尿外科并发症发生率更高。

Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.

作者信息

Hwang Jong Ha, Kim Bitnarae

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongwon Cancer Specialized Care Hospital, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7331-7340. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980
PMID:39051908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11573078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) has been increasingly adopted for its benefits of reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the incidence of intraoperative urologic complications, including bladder and ureteral injuries, between MIRH and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH).

METHOD

The authors systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 2024. A total of 35 studies were analyzed to compute odds ratios (ORs) for intraoperative urologic complications, bladder injuries, and ureteral injuries, focusing on subgroup evaluations by publication year, study quality, BMI, geographic region, and surgical method.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis demonstrates that MIRH is associated with higher risks of intraoperative urologic complications (OR=2.412, 95% CI: 1.995-2.916, P <0.001), bladder injuries (OR=2.109, 95% CI: 1.567-2.839, P <0.01), and ureteral injuries (OR=2.549, 95% CI: 1.992-3.262, P <0.001). No publication bias was detected across the studies, ensuring the robustness of the findings. Significant differences in complication rates were also observed across geographic and procedural subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The findings confirm that MIRH has a higher rate of intraoperative urologic complications, including bladder and ureteral injuries, compared to ARH. These results provide essential insights that could guide clinical decision-making and influence surgical practice guidelines.

摘要

背景

微创根治性子宫切除术(MIRH)因其具有减少失血和缩短住院时间的优点而越来越多地被采用。本研究旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以比较MIRH与腹式根治性子宫切除术(ARH)术中泌尿系统并发症(包括膀胱和输尿管损伤)的发生率。

方法

作者系统检索了截至2024年4月发表在PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆的研究。共分析了35项研究,以计算术中泌尿系统并发症、膀胱损伤和输尿管损伤的比值比(OR),重点按发表年份、研究质量、体重指数、地理区域和手术方法进行亚组评估。

结果

荟萃分析表明,MIRH与术中泌尿系统并发症(OR=2.412,95%CI:1.995-2.916,P<0.001)、膀胱损伤(OR=2.109,95%CI:1.567-2.839,P<0.01)和输尿管损伤(OR=2.549,95%CI:1.992-3.262,P<0.001)的风险较高相关。在各项研究中未检测到发表偏倚,确保了研究结果的稳健性。在地理和手术亚组中也观察到并发症发生率的显著差异。

结论

研究结果证实,与ARH相比,MIRH术中泌尿系统并发症(包括膀胱和输尿管损伤)的发生率更高。这些结果提供了重要的见解,可指导临床决策并影响手术实践指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/5a9a44721a33/js9-110-7331-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/25c131119023/js9-110-7331-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/308f68e5e3c7/js9-110-7331-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/a23f2614235b/js9-110-7331-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/5a9a44721a33/js9-110-7331-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/25c131119023/js9-110-7331-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/308f68e5e3c7/js9-110-7331-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/a23f2614235b/js9-110-7331-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f50f/11573078/5a9a44721a33/js9-110-7331-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.荟萃分析显示,与腹式根治性子宫切除术相比,微创根治性子宫切除术的术中泌尿外科并发症发生率更高。
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7331-7340. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980.
2
Postoperative Urinary Complications in Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy: A Meta-Analysis With a Focus on Ureterovaginal Fistula.微创根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术术后泌尿系统并发症:一项聚焦输尿管阴道瘘的Meta分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Jun;32(6):502-511. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
4
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术比腹式根治性子宫切除术有更高的围手术期泌尿系统并发症风险:38 项研究的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07366-1. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
5
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 26;2014(12):CD005073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub4.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
7
Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review.腹腔镜子宫切除术中的尿路损伤:一项系统评价
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):558-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
8
SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.SUCCOR 研究中微创与开腹广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的并发症比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Feb 5;34(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004657.
9
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
10
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.对局部晚期宫颈癌女性患者进行子宫切除术并辅以放疗或化疗或两者联合治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Urinary Tract Injuries in Gynecological Surgery: Current Insights and Future Directions.探索妇科手术中的泌尿道损伤:当前见解与未来方向
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;13(15):1780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151780.

本文引用的文献

1
SUCCOR morbidity: complications in minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.SUCCOR 研究中微创与开腹广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的并发症比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Feb 5;34(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004657.
2
Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.比较早期宫颈癌患者行开腹和微创根治性子宫切除术的结局。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;35(5):e60. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e60. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
3
Effect of annualized surgeon volume on major surgical complications for abdominal and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016: a retrospective cohort study.
2004-2016 年中国宫颈癌开腹和腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的年度外科医生手术量对主要手术并发症的影响:回顾性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 15;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02213-6.
4
Urologic Complication after Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Gynecology Oncology: A Single-Center Analysis and Narrative Review of the Literature.妇科肿瘤腹腔镜子宫切除术后的泌尿系统并发症:单中心分析及文献回顾。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 18;58(12):1869. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121869.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.比较肿瘤学结果和主要并发症在腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术和腹部根治性子宫切除术之间为阶段 IB1 宫颈癌与肿瘤大小小于 2 厘米。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):2125-2133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.238. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Risk factors and long-term impact of urologic complications during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in China, 2004-2016.2004-2016 年中国根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的泌尿系统并发症的危险因素及长期影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.029. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术比腹式根治性子宫切除术有更高的围手术期泌尿系统并发症风险:38 项研究的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07366-1. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
9
Effect of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy on major surgical complications in women with stage IA-IIB cervical cancer in China, 2004-2015.腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗中国 2004-2015 年 IA-IIB 期宫颈癌患者主要手术并发症的效果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.032. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
10
Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.早期宫颈癌微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术不良事件发生率的随机对照研究结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):249.e1-249.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 3.