Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行的死亡率监测:对疾病预防控制中心多系统策略的审查。

Mortality Surveillance for the COVID-19 Pandemic: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Multiple System Strategy.

机构信息

Diba Khan, Peter Grillo, and Sarah David are with the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Viruses Division (CORVID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA. Meeyoung Park is with Situational Awareness Team, Division of Emergency Operations, Office of Readiness and Response, CDC, Atlanta. Lauren Rossen and Farida B. Ahmad are with National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD. B. Casey Lyons is with Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta. Mathew D. Ritchey and Adi V. Gundlapalli are with the Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance, and Technology, CDC, Atlanta. A. D. McNaghten is with the Division of HIV Prevention, CDC, Atlanta. Amitabh B. Suthar is with the Clinical Surveillance and Epidemiology Team, Division of Global HIV and TB, Global Health Center, CDC, Atlanta.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1071-1080. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307743. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

Mortality surveillance systems can have limitations, including reporting delays, incomplete reporting, missing data, and insufficient detail on important risk or sociodemographic factors that can impact the accuracy of estimates of current trends, disease severity, and related disparities across subpopulations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used multiple data systems during the COVID-19 emergency response-line-level case‒death surveillance, aggregate death surveillance, and the National Vital Statistics System-to collectively provide more comprehensive and timely information on COVID-19‒associated mortality necessary for informed decisions. This article will review in detail the line-level, aggregate, and National Vital Statistics System surveillance systems and the purpose and use of each. This retrospective review of the hybrid surveillance systems strategy may serve as an example for adaptive informational approaches needed over the course of future public health emergencies. (. 2024;114(10):1071-1080. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307743).

摘要

死亡监测系统可能存在局限性,包括报告延迟、报告不完整、数据缺失以及重要风险或社会人口因素的细节信息不足,这些因素可能会影响当前趋势、疾病严重程度以及亚人群相关差异的估计的准确性。在 COVID-19 紧急响应期间,疾病预防控制中心使用了多个数据系统——线级病例-死亡监测、综合死亡监测和国家生命统计系统——共同提供更全面和及时的 COVID-19 相关死亡率信息,为明智决策提供依据。本文将详细回顾线级、综合和国家生命统计系统监测系统,以及每个系统的目的和用途。这种混合监测系统策略的回顾性分析可能为未来公共卫生紧急情况下所需的适应性信息方法提供范例。(doi:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307743)。

相似文献

9
Comparing the COVID-19 Responses in Cuba and the United States.比较古巴和美国的 COVID-19 应对措施。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Dec;111(12):2186-2193. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306526.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验