• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舌下神经刺激的疼痛结局比较分析:避免二腹肌肌腱。

Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon.

机构信息

Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep-Oct;45(5):104391. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104391. Epub 2024 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104391
PMID:39053311
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Upper airway stimulation effectively treats patients with obstructive sleep apnea, especially among those with low long-term compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Traditional methods to implant the hypoglossal nerve stimulator involve retraction of the digastric tendon to identify the nerve and improve exposure for stimulator implantation. Transient submental pain and discomfort are known side effects of the procedure. Placement without retraction provides an alternative approach to minimize postoperative pain. This study compares post-operative pain outcomes of patients in whom the digastric tendon was and was not retracted.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who received the hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. A combination of descriptive and qualitative data, including age, gender, comorbidities, and postoperative symptoms are analyzed to characterize patient outcomes resulting from this intraoperative technique. The categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-squared tests and independent t-tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Patients report overall satisfaction after implantation and titration. A total of 108 patients underwent HGNS implantation between September 2017 and January 2021 using the aforementioned techniques. 1.69 % of patients experienced postoperative submental pain as compared to 18.37 % prior to the change in technique (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Avoidance of digastric tendon retraction in the implantation of the stimulating lead is a safe and effective technique that reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. Our institution has demonstrated an alternative technique for hypoglossal stimulator implantation which improves perioperative outcomes.

LAY SUMMARY

Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. During surgery, the digastric tendon is often moved to identify the nerve and improve access. This study shows that avoiding digastric tendon movement safely reduces postoperative pain and discomfort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

上气道刺激有效地治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者,尤其是那些对持续气道正压通气治疗长期依从性低的患者。植入舌下神经刺激器的传统方法涉及牵引二腹肌肌腱以识别神经并改善刺激器植入的暴露度。已知该手术的术后短期颏下疼痛和不适是副作用。不牵引的放置提供了一种替代方法,可以最大程度地减少术后疼痛。本研究比较了牵引和不牵引二腹肌肌腱的患者术后疼痛结果。

方法

对 2017 年至 2021 年期间在一家机构接受舌下神经刺激器植入的患者进行回顾性图表审查。采用描述性和定性数据的组合,包括年龄、性别、合并症和术后症状,对这种术中技术产生的患者结果进行分析。使用卡方检验和独立 t 检验分别分析分类变量和连续变量。

结果

患者在植入和滴定后报告总体满意度。共有 108 名患者在 2017 年 9 月至 2021 年 1 月期间使用上述技术接受了 HGNS 植入。与技术变更前相比,术后颏下疼痛的患者比例为 1.69%,而技术变更前为 18.37%(p < 0.01)。

结论

在刺激导联植入过程中避免牵引二腹肌肌腱是一种安全有效的技术,可以减少术后疼痛和不适。我们的机构已经证明了一种替代的舌下神经刺激器植入技术,可改善围手术期结果。

要点

上气道刺激是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的有效方法。在手术中,通常会移动二腹肌肌腱以识别神经并改善进入。本研究表明,避免二腹肌肌腱运动可以安全地减轻术后疼痛和不适。

证据水平

III 级。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon.舌下神经刺激的疼痛结局比较分析:避免二腹肌肌腱。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep-Oct;45(5):104391. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104391. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
2
Upper airway stimulation therapy and prior airway surgery for obstructive sleep apnea.上气道刺激疗法与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的既往气道手术
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):1486-1489. doi: 10.1002/lary.26956. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Explantation Technique and Outcomes: A Retrospective Case Series.舌下神经刺激器取出技术及疗效:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2023;85(5):248-252. doi: 10.1159/000529011. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Treating obstructive sleep apnea with hypoglossal nerve stimulation.舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。
Sleep. 2011 Nov 1;34(11):1479-86. doi: 10.5665/sleep.1380.
5
Early feasibility of hypoglossal nerve upper airway stimulator in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and continuous positive airway pressure-intolerant severe obstructive sleep apnea.舌下神经上气道刺激器在伴有心脏植入式电子设备和不耐持续气道正压通气的重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者中的早期可行性。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1165-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation in an Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus Hospital.舌下神经刺激器植入术在日间手术中心与医院的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Mar;132(3):706-710. doi: 10.1002/lary.29875. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Therapeutic Positive Airway Pressure Level Predicts Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.治疗性气道正压水平预测舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的反应。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Aug 15;15(8):1165-1172. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7814.
8
Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation: Outcomes in Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Common Comorbid Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.舌下神经刺激术:伴有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和常见合并症创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人的结局。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131 Suppl 3:S1-S11. doi: 10.1002/lary.29292. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Dysfunctional hypoglossal nerve stimulator after electrical cardioversion: A case series.电复律后舌下神经刺激器功能障碍:病例系列
Laryngoscope. 2019 Aug;129(8):1949-1953. doi: 10.1002/lary.27488. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Neurophysiological profiles of responders and nonresponders to hypoglossal nerve stimulation: a single-institution study.舌下神经刺激反应者和无反应者的神经生理学特征:单机构研究。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 May 1;18(5):1327-1333. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9852.