Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and School of Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Beijing, 102600, China.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121743. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121743. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
The carbon emissions trading (CET) policy internalises the cost of carbon emission reductions borne by companies, which will affect the companies' investment and management decisions. From a micro perspective, this paper analyzes the impact on company investment expenditure and its transmission mechanism by implementing the CET policy. Based on panel data of China's A-share listed companies from eight carbon-intensive industries spanning 2010 to 2020, the time-varying difference-in-difference model and its extended model are used to evaluate the impact of the policy in the pilot areas. The results show that: first, based on the cost effect and legality theories, CET policy can reduce the investment expenditure of the companies by 71.95%. Second, CET policy reduces corporate investment expenditures by increasing corporate debt financing costs. When debt financing costs increase by 120.25%, the investment expenditures will reduce by 2.56% indirectly while the intermediary effect of equity financing costs is not significant. Finally, with the implementation of CET policy, the inhibitory effect on corporate investment expenditures has gradually increased. CET policy has a more significant inhibitory effect on investment expenditures of nonstate-owned companies and small-scale companies. The results have passed the robustness test and provide evidence for the policy-maker to balance microeconomic entity development and carbon reduction, and for companies to make optimization investment and financing decisions in response to policy shocks effectively.
碳排放交易(CET)政策将公司承担的碳排放减排成本内部化,这将影响公司的投资和管理决策。本文从微观角度出发,通过实施 CET 政策,分析其对公司投资支出的影响及其传导机制。利用 2010 年至 2020 年中国八个碳密集型行业的 A 股上市公司面板数据,采用时变双重差分模型及其扩展模型,对试点地区的政策效果进行评估。结果表明:首先,基于成本效应和合法性理论,CET 政策可以降低公司的投资支出 71.95%。其次,CET 政策通过增加企业债务融资成本来降低企业投资支出。当债务融资成本增加 120.25%时,投资支出将间接减少 2.56%,而股权融资成本的中介效应并不显著。最后,随着 CET 政策的实施,对企业投资支出的抑制作用逐渐增强。CET 政策对非国有企业和小规模企业的投资支出抑制作用更为显著。结果通过了稳健性检验,为政策制定者在平衡微观经济实体发展和碳减排、企业有效应对政策冲击做出优化投资和融资决策提供了依据。