Suppr超能文献

描述正压通气过程中应用力的特征:一项随机交叉模拟研究。

Characterising applied forces during positive pressure ventilation: a randomised cross-over simulation study.

机构信息

Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Pediatrics-Neonatal, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jul 24;8(1):e002828. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002828.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterise applied force on the face and head during simulated mask ventilation with varying mask, device and expertise level.

DESIGN

Randomised cross-over simulation study.

SETTING

A quiet, empty room in the children's hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Neonatal healthcare providers, categorised as novices and experts in positive pressure ventilation (PPV).

INTERVENTIONS

PPV for 2 min each in a 2×2 within-subjects design with two masks (round and anatomic) and two ventilation devices (T-piece and self-inflating bag (SIB)).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Applied force (Newton (N)) measured under the head and at four locations on the manikin's face (nasal bridge, mentum, left and right zygomatic arches) and symmetry of force applied around the mask rim.

RESULTS

For the 51 participants, force applied to the head was greater with the SIB than the T-piece (mean (SD): 16.03 (6.96) N vs 14.31 (5.16) N) and greater with the anatomic mask than the round mask (mean (SD): 16.07 (6.80) N vs 14.26 (5.35) N). Underhead force decreased over the duration of PPV for all conditions. Force measured on the face was greatest at the left zygomatic arch (median (IQR): 0.97 (0.70-1.43) N) and least at the mentum (median (IQR): 0.44 (0.28-0.61) N). Overall, experts applied more equal force around the mask rim compared with novices (median (IQR): 0.46 (0.26-0.79) N vs 0.65 (0.24-1.18) N, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

We characterised an initial dataset of applied forces on the face and head during simulated PPV and described differences in force when considering mask type, device type and expertise.

摘要

目的

研究在模拟面罩通气过程中,不同面罩、通气设备和专业水平对面部和头部施加力的特点。

设计

随机交叉模拟研究。

地点

儿童医院的一个安静、空旷的房间。

参与者

新生儿保健提供者,分为正压通气(PPV)新手和专家。

干预措施

每位参与者在 2×2 组内设计中,每种条件下各进行 2 分钟的 PPV,使用两种面罩(圆形和解剖形)和两种通气设备(T 型件和自动充气袋(SIB))。

主要观察指标

在头部下和假人面部的四个位置(鼻桥、下颌、左、右颧骨弓)测量的施加力(牛顿(N))以及面罩边缘施加力的对称性。

结果

在 51 名参与者中,与 T 型件相比,SIB 施加到头部的力更大(平均(SD):16.03(6.96)N 比 14.31(5.16)N),与圆形面罩相比,解剖形面罩施加的力更大(平均(SD):16.07(6.80)N 比 14.26(5.35)N)。在所有条件下,PPV 过程中的头部下力随时间逐渐降低。在面部测量的力在左颧骨弓处最大(中位数(IQR):0.97(0.70-1.43)N),在下颌处最小(中位数(IQR):0.44(0.28-0.61)N)。总体而言,与新手相比,专家在面罩边缘施加的力更为均匀(中位数(IQR):0.46(0.26-0.79)N 比 0.65(0.24-1.18)N,p<0.001)。

结论

我们描述了在模拟 PPV 过程中面部和头部受力的初始数据集,并描述了在考虑面罩类型、通气设备类型和专业水平时力的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f37/11284901/24359a970114/bmjpo-8-1-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验