Patel Mehul D, Chari Srihari V, Cui Eric R, Fernandez Antonio R, Planey Arrianna Marie, Jauch Edward C, Winslow James E
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
ESO, Inc., Austin, Texas, USA.
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12868. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12868. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Acute stroke is a serious, time-sensitive condition requiring immediate medical attention. Emergency medical services (EMS) routing and direct transport of acute stroke patients to stroke centers improves timely access to care. This study aimed to describe EMS stroke routing and transports by rurality in North Carolina (NC).
We conducted a retrospective study using existing data on EMS transports of suspected stroke patients in NC in 2019. The primary study outcome was EMS bypass of the nearest hospital for transport to a nonnearest hospital, determined by geographic information systems (GIS) analysis. Incident addresses were geocoded to census tracts and classified as urban, suburban, or rural by Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. We compared the frequency of bypass and estimated additional transport times by urban, suburban, and rural incident locations.
Of 3666 patients, 1884 (51%) EMS transports bypassed the nearest hospital. Bypass occurred less often for rural EMS incidents (39%) compared to those in urban (57%) and suburban (63%) tracts. The estimated additional transport time for rural bypasses of nonendovascular-capable stroke centers for endovascular-capable stroke centers was a median of 25 min (interquartile range 13-33).
Using GIS analysis, we found nearly half of EMS transports of suspected stroke patients in NC bypassed the nearest hospital, including noncertified hospitals and stroke centers. Bypasses occurred less often in rural areas, though incurred significantly longer transport times, compared to urban areas. These findings are important for regional stroke system planning, especially for improving rural access to acute stroke care.
急性中风是一种严重的、对时间敏感的疾病,需要立即就医。紧急医疗服务(EMS)路线规划以及将急性中风患者直接转运至中风中心可改善及时获得治疗的机会。本研究旨在描述北卡罗来纳州(NC)按农村地区划分的EMS中风路线规划及转运情况。
我们利用2019年北卡罗来纳州疑似中风患者的EMS转运现有数据进行了一项回顾性研究。主要研究结果是通过地理信息系统(GIS)分析确定EMS绕过最近的医院而转运至非最近的医院。将事件发生地址进行地理编码至普查区,并根据城乡通勤区代码分类为城市、郊区或农村。我们比较了城市、郊区和农村事件发生地点的绕过频率以及估计的额外转运时间。
在3666例患者中,1884例(51%)的EMS转运绕过了最近的医院。与城市(57%)和郊区(63%)地区相比,农村EMS事件的绕过情况较少(39%)。对于无法进行血管内治疗的中风中心的农村患者绕过至有血管内治疗能力的中风中心,估计的额外转运时间中位数为25分钟(四分位间距13 - 33)。
通过GIS分析,我们发现北卡罗来纳州近一半的疑似中风患者的EMS转运绕过了最近的医院,包括未经认证的医院和中风中心。与城市地区相比,农村地区的绕过情况较少,尽管转运时间明显更长。这些发现对于区域中风系统规划很重要,特别是对于改善农村地区急性中风治疗的可及性。