• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过 211 实现儿童早期保健协调:一项随机临床试验。

Early Childhood Care Coordination Through 211: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Departments of Pediatrics and Children's Development and Innovation Institute.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2024 Aug 1;154(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-065232.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2023-065232
PMID:39054946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11291962/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Early intervention services can improve outcomes for children with developmental delays. Health care providers, however, often struggle to ensure timely referrals and services. We tested the effectiveness of telephone-based early childhood developmental care coordination through 211 LA, a health and human services call center serving Los Angeles County, in increasing referral and enrollment in services.

METHODS

In partnership with 4 clinic systems, we recruited and randomly assigned children aged 12 to 42 months with upcoming well-child visits and without a known developmental delay, to intervention versus usual care. All children received developmental screening and usual clinic care. Intervention children also received telephone connection to a 211 LA early childhood care coordinator who made referrals and conducted follow-up. Primary outcomes at a 6-month follow-up included parent-reported referral and enrollment in developmental services. Secondary outcomes included referral and enrollment in early care and education (ECE). Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of outcomes, adjusted for key covariates.

RESULTS

Of 565 families (282 intervention, 283 control), 512 (90.6%) provided follow-up data. Among all participants, more intervention than control children were referred to (25% vs 16%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.25, P = .003) and enrolled in (15% vs 9%, AOR 2.35, P = .008) ≥1 service, and more intervention than control children were referred to (58% vs 15%, AOR 9.06, P < .001) and enrolled in (26% vs 10%, AOR 3.75, P < .001) ECE.

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone-based care coordination through 211 LA is effective in connecting young children to developmental services and ECE, offering a potentially scalable solution for gaps and disparities.

摘要

背景与目的

早期干预服务可以改善发育迟缓儿童的结局。然而,医疗保健提供者在确保及时转诊和服务方面常常面临困难。我们通过洛杉矶的一个健康和人类服务呼叫中心 211 LA 测试了基于电话的幼儿发育保健协调对增加服务转诊和参与的效果。

方法

我们与 4 个诊所系统合作,招募并随机分配即将进行常规儿童健康检查且无已知发育迟缓的 12 至 42 月龄儿童,进入干预组或常规护理组。所有儿童均接受发育筛查和常规诊所护理。干预组儿童还通过电话与 211 LA 幼儿保健协调员联系,协调员进行转诊并开展后续工作。6 个月随访时的主要结局包括家长报告的转诊和发育服务参与情况。次要结局包括早期保健和教育(ECE)的转诊和参与。使用逻辑回归模型估计结局的比值比(OR),并调整了关键协变量。

结果

在 565 个家庭(282 个干预组,283 个对照组)中,有 512 个(90.6%)提供了随访数据。在所有参与者中,与对照组相比,更多的干预组儿童被转诊(25%比 16%,调整后的 OR 2.25,P =.003)并参与(15%比 9%,OR 2.35,P =.008)≥1 项服务,更多的干预组儿童被转诊(58%比 15%,OR 9.06,P <.001)并参与(26%比 10%,OR 3.75,P <.001)ECE。

结论

通过 211 LA 进行基于电话的保健协调可有效将幼儿与发育服务和 ECE 联系起来,为解决差距和不平等问题提供了一种潜在的可扩展解决方案。

相似文献

1
Early Childhood Care Coordination Through 211: A Randomized Clinical Trial.通过 211 实现儿童早期保健协调:一项随机临床试验。
Pediatrics. 2024 Aug 1;154(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-065232.
2
Family-centred interventions for Indigenous early childhood well-being by primary healthcare services.以初级医疗保健服务为中心的家庭干预措施,促进土著儿童早期的身心健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD012463. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012463.pub2.
3
Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.学龄前儿童言语和语言发育迟缓筛查:美国预防服务工作组的系统证据综述
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):e298-319. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1467.
4
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
5
Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.针对患有复杂疾病儿童的综合护理方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD013329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013329.pub2.
6
Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants.出院后提供早期发育干预计划,以预防早产儿的运动和认知障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 13;2(2):CD005495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub5.
7
Early Intervention for Children With Developmental Disabilities and Their Families via Telehealth: Systematic Review.通过远程医疗对发育障碍儿童及其家庭进行早期干预:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 17;27:e66442. doi: 10.2196/66442.
8
Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.旨在减少儿童接触环境烟草烟雾的家庭及照顾者吸烟控制项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 31;1(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4.
9
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
10
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Family Navigation on Diagnostic Ascertainment Among Children at Risk for Autism: A Randomized Clinical Trial From DBPNet.家庭导航对自闭症风险儿童诊断确定的影响:来自 DBPNet 的一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Mar 1;175(3):243-250. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5218.
2
Factors influencing access to early intervention for families of children with developmental disabilities: A narrative review.影响发展障碍儿童家庭获得早期干预服务的因素:叙事性综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 May;34(3):695-711. doi: 10.1111/jar.12852. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
Family navigation to increase evaluation for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers: Screening and Linkage to Services for Autism pragmatic randomized trial.
家庭引导以增加幼儿自闭症谱系障碍评估:自闭症筛查与服务联系实用随机试验
Autism. 2021 May;25(4):946-957. doi: 10.1177/1362361320974175. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
4
Identification, Evaluation, and Management of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的识别、评估和管理。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3447. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
5
Promoting Optimal Development: Identifying Infants and Young Children With Developmental Disorders Through Developmental Surveillance and Screening.促进最佳发展:通过发育监测和筛查识别发育障碍的婴儿和幼儿。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3449. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Prevalence and Trends of Developmental Disabilities among Children in the United States: 2009-2017.美国儿童发育障碍的患病率和趋势:2009-2017 年。
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0811.
7
Defining the core components of Family Navigation for autism spectrum disorder.定义孤独症谱系障碍家庭导航的核心组成部分。
Autism. 2020 Feb;24(2):526-530. doi: 10.1177/1362361319864079. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Telephone-Based Developmental Screening and Care Coordination Through 2-1-1: A Randomized Trial.基于电话的发育筛查和通过 2-1-1 进行的护理协调:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2019 Apr;143(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1064.
9
Prevalence and Variation of Developmental Screening and Surveillance in Early Childhood.儿童早期发育筛查和监测的流行率和变异性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 1;172(9):857-866. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1524.
10
Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Young Children: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.儿童自闭症谱系障碍筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 16;315(7):691-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0018.