Zhang Chong, Zhou Shuang-Shuang, Li Xiang-Rong, Wang Bao-Ming, Lin Neng-Ming, Feng Lin-Yi, Zhang Da-Yong, Zhang Li-Huang, Wang Un-Bo, Pan Jian-Ping
School of Medicine, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, P.R. China.
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310022, P.R. China.
Oncol Rep. 2024 Oct;52(4). doi: 10.3892/or.2024.8783. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
Following the publication of this article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that the flow cytometric (FCM) plots in Fig. 2A on p. 2278 showing the 'Dasatinib' and 'CA‑4' experiments were duplicates of each other. After having re‑examined their original data, and due to the overall similarity of the data, the authors have realized that these data were inadvertently assembled incorrectly in the figure. They realize that they also made a further mistake regarding the writing of the ratios of mitochondrial membrane‑depolarized HO‑8910 cells for these FCM plots (essentially, these were written the wrong way around): The percentage of mitochondrial membrane‑depolarized HO‑8910 cells should have been written as 22.50% for the dasatinib‑treated cells (the centre‑left FCM plot) and 15.71% for the CA‑4‑treated cells (centre‑right plot). A revised version of Fig. 2 now showing alternative data for the FCM experiments shown in Fig. 2A, is shown on the next page. Note that the errors made in terms of assembling the data in Fig. 2A did not greatly affect either the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum. The authors regret that these errors went unnoticed prior to the publication of their article, and are grateful to the Editor of for granting them this opportunity to publish a corrigendum. Furthermore, they apologize to the readership for any inconvenience caused. [Oncology Reports 29: 2275‑2282, 2013; DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2405].
在本文发表后,一位感兴趣的读者提请作者注意,第2278页图2A中显示“达沙替尼”和“CA-4”实验的流式细胞术(FCM)图彼此重复。在重新检查原始数据后,由于数据的总体相似性,作者意识到这些数据在图中被无意中错误组装。他们还意识到,对于这些FCM图,他们在撰写线粒体膜去极化的HO-8910细胞比例时犯了另一个错误(本质上,这些比例写反了):达沙替尼处理的细胞(左中FCM图)中线粒体膜去极化的HO-8910细胞百分比应为22.50%,CA-4处理的细胞(右中FCM图)应为15.71%。下一页展示了图2的修订版,其中显示了图2A中FCM实验的替代数据。请注意,图2A中数据组装方面的错误对本文报道的结果或结论影响不大,所有作者均同意发表此勘误。作者对这些错误在文章发表前未被注意到表示遗憾,并感谢《肿瘤学报告》编辑给予他们发表勘误的机会。此外,他们就由此造成的不便向读者致歉。[《肿瘤学报告》29: 2275 - 2282, 2013; DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2405]