Colliard Ian, Deblonde Gauthier J-P
Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Glenn T. Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Material Sciences Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
JACS Au. 2024 May 9;4(7):2503-2513. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00245. eCollection 2024 Jul 22.
Experimental studies involving actinide compounds are inherently limited in scope due to the radioactive nature of these elements and the scarcity and cost of their research isotopes. Now, ∼80 years after the introduction of the actinide concept by Glenn Seaborg, we still only have a limited understanding of the coordination chemistry of f-block metals when compared to more common elements such as the s-, p-, and d-blocks. This is particularly true for transplutonium actinides (Am, Cm, Bk, etc.) whose chemistry is often considered similar to trivalent lanthanides-mainly because of the lack of experimental data. We here report a metal-ligand system for which lanthanide and heavy actinide coordination compounds can be synthesized efficiently (i.e., requiring only a few micrograms) under identical conditions. Seventeen single crystal XRD structures of trivalent f-elements complexed to the polyoxometalate (POM) PWO were obtained, including the full lanthanide series (CsLn(PWO)·HO, Ln = La to Lu, except Pm), the equivalent yttrium compound, a curium-POM compound (α-CsCm(PWO)·33HO), and the first two Am-POM compounds structurally characterized (α-CsAm(PWO)·6HO and α-CsAm(PWO)·21HO). Importantly, this represents a unique series of compounds built on the same 1:2 metal:ligand unit and where all the f-elements are 8-coordinated and squared antiprismatic, thus providing a consistent platform for intra- and inter-series comparison. Despite a similar first coordination sphere environment, significant crystallographic and spectroscopic differences were observed among early and late lanthanides, as well as lanthanides and actinides, and even between americium and curium. These results show that even within the same coordination chemistry framework, 4f and 5f elements exhibit fundamental chemical differences that cannot be explained by simple size-match arguments. This study offers a versatile coordination platform to magnify differences within the f-block that have remained difficult to observe with traditional ligand systems.
由于锕系元素具有放射性,且其研究用同位素稀缺、成本高昂,涉及锕系化合物的实验研究在范围上存在固有局限。如今,在格伦·西博格提出锕系元素概念约80年后,与s、p、d区等更常见元素相比,我们对f区金属的配位化学仍了解有限。对于超钚锕系元素(镅、锔、锫等)而言尤其如此,其化学性质常被认为与三价镧系元素相似,主要原因是缺乏实验数据。我们在此报告一种金属 - 配体体系,在相同条件下能够高效合成(即仅需几微克)镧系和重锕系配位化合物。我们获得了17种与多金属氧酸盐(POM)PWO配位的三价f元素的单晶XRD结构,包括完整的镧系元素系列(CsLn(PWO)·H₂O,Ln = La至Lu,钷除外)、等效的钇化合物、一种锔 - POM化合物(α - CsCm(PWO)·33H₂O)以及首批经结构表征的两种镅 - POM化合物(α - CsAm(PWO)·6H₂O和α - CsAm(PWO)·21H₂O)。重要的是,这代表了一系列独特的化合物,它们基于相同的1:2金属:配体单元构建,且所有f元素均为8配位且呈方形反棱柱体结构,从而为系列内和系列间比较提供了一个一致的平台。尽管第一配位层环境相似,但在早期和晚期镧系元素之间、镧系元素和锕系元素之间,甚至在镅和锔之间,都观察到了显著的晶体学和光谱学差异。这些结果表明,即使在相同的配位化学框架内,4f和5f元素也表现出无法用简单的尺寸匹配观点解释的基本化学差异。本研究提供了一个通用的配位平台,以放大f区内传统配体体系难以观察到差异。