• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电镀行业中个人硫酸暴露:预测模型的开发与验证

Personal Exposure to Sulfuric Acid in the Electroplating Industry: Development and Validation of a Predictive Model.

作者信息

Wang Austin B, Chuang Kai-Jen, Wang Ven-Shing, Chang Ta-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Occupational Safety and Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, No. 100, Sec. 1, Jingmao Rd. Beitun Dist., Taichung City 406040, Taiwan.

Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung City 406040, Taiwan.

出版信息

Toxics. 2024 Jul 3;12(7):489. doi: 10.3390/toxics12070489.

DOI:10.3390/toxics12070489
PMID:39058141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281176/
Abstract

This study aimed to measure personal exposure to sulfuric acid in the electroplating industry to establish a predictive model and test its validation. We collected indoor air parameters and related information from four electroplating plants. Silica gel sorbents were used to collect air samples using high-performance ion chromatography. We collected air samples from three plants (i.e., Plant B, Plant C, and Plant D) and applied multiple linear regressions to build a predictive model. Eight samples collected from the fourth plant (i.e., Plant A) were used to validate the model. A total of 41 samples were collected with a mean of 25.0 ± 9.8 μg/m (range 12.1-51.7 μg/m) in this study, including Plant A (8 samples, 17.5 ± 2.8 μg/m, 13.0-22.0 μg/m), Plant B (11 samples, 36.5 ± 9.7 μg/m, 23.1-51.7 μg/m), Plant C (11 samples, 16.4 ± 1.7 μg/m, 12.1-17.8 μg/m), and Plant D (11 samples, 27.4 ± 1.7 μg/m, 24.1-29.9 μg/m). Plant B was significantly higher in sulfuric acid than the other plants. Workers from the electroplating process plants were exposed to sulfuric acid at 29.0 ± 11.5 μg/m. The predictive model for personal exposure to sulfuric acid fit the data well (r = 0.853; adjusted r = 0.837) and had an accuracy of 5.52 μg/m (bias ± precision; 4.98 ± 2.38 μg/m), validated by the personal sampling of the fourth plant. This study observed that sulfuric acid exposure was lower than the permissible exposure level of 1000 μg/m in Taiwan and the United States, and only two samples were lower than the European Union standard of 50 μg/m. The developed model can be applied in epidemiological studies to predict personal exposure to sulfuric acid in plants using electroplating.

摘要

本研究旨在测量电镀行业中个人接触硫酸的情况,以建立预测模型并测试其有效性。我们从四家电镀厂收集了室内空气参数和相关信息。使用硅胶吸附剂,通过高效离子色谱法采集空气样本。我们从三家工厂(即工厂B、工厂C和工厂D)采集空气样本,并应用多元线性回归建立预测模型。从第四家工厂(即工厂A)采集的八个样本用于验证该模型。本研究共采集了41个样本,平均浓度为25.0±9.8μg/m³(范围为12.1 - 51.7μg/m³),其中工厂A(8个样本,17.5±2.8μg/m³,13.0 - 22.0μg/m³),工厂B(11个样本,36.5±9.7μg/m³,23.1 - 51.7μg/m³),工厂C(11个样本,16.4±1.7μg/m³,12.1 - 17.8μg/m³),工厂D(11个样本,27.4±1.7μg/m³,24.1 - 29.9μg/m³)。工厂B的硫酸含量显著高于其他工厂。来自电镀加工厂的工人接触硫酸的浓度为29.0±11.5μg/m³。个人接触硫酸的预测模型与数据拟合良好(r = 0.853;调整后r = 0.837),经第四家工厂的个人采样验证,其准确度为5.52μg/m³(偏差±精密度;4.98±2.38μg/m³)。本研究观察到,台湾和美国的硫酸接触量低于1000μg/m³的允许接触水平,只有两个样本低于欧盟50μg/m³的标准。所开发的模型可应用于流行病学研究,以预测电镀厂中个人接触硫酸的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/ddcaeee58ec9/toxics-12-00489-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/97926aa78f2f/toxics-12-00489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/51f64e9ebca4/toxics-12-00489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/ddcaeee58ec9/toxics-12-00489-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/97926aa78f2f/toxics-12-00489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/51f64e9ebca4/toxics-12-00489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04f/11281176/ddcaeee58ec9/toxics-12-00489-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal Exposure to Sulfuric Acid in the Electroplating Industry: Development and Validation of a Predictive Model.电镀行业中个人硫酸暴露:预测模型的开发与验证
Toxics. 2024 Jul 3;12(7):489. doi: 10.3390/toxics12070489.
2
The Evaluation of Worker Exposure to Airborne Silica Dust During Five OSHA Table I Construction Tasks.五种 OSHA 表 I 建筑任务中工人接触空气中二氧化硅粉尘的评估。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jun 6;67(5):572-583. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad012.
3
Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM, BC, NO, and O: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.长期暴露于低水平 PM、BC、NO 和 O 对死亡率和发病率的影响:ELAPSE 项目中欧洲队列的分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 Sep;2021(208):1-127.
4
Occupational exposures to styrene vapor in a manufacturing plant for fiber-reinforced composite wind turbine blades.在一家纤维增强复合材料风力涡轮机叶片制造工厂中,职业性接触苯乙烯蒸气的情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jul;55(6):591-600. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer021. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Size-resolved sulfuric acid mist concentrations at phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facilities in Florida.佛罗里达州磷肥生产设施中按粒径解析的硫酸雾浓度。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Jan;51(1):81-9. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel066. Epub 2006 Oct 10.
6
Exposure to fibres, crystalline silica, silicon carbide and sulphur dioxide in the norwegian silicon carbide industry.挪威碳化硅行业中纤维、结晶二氧化硅、碳化硅和二氧化硫的暴露情况。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Jul;52(5):317-36. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men029. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
7
Dental erosion and sulfuric ion exposure levels in individuals working with sulfuric acid in lead storage battery manufacturing plant measured with mouth-rinse index.使用漱口水指数测量铅酸蓄电池制造工厂中接触硫酸的工人的牙齿侵蚀和硫酸离子暴露水平。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51(4):193-9. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.51.193.
8
Exposure to sulfuric acid in zinc production.锌生产过程中接触硫酸。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2004 Mar;48(2):159-70. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh011.
9
Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.个人对挥发性有机化合物混合物的暴露:RIOPA数据的建模与进一步分析
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2014 Jun(181):3-63.
10
Lead exposure and blood pressure among workers in diverse industrial plants in Kenya.肯尼亚不同工厂工人的铅暴露与血压情况
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2014;11(11):706-15. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2014.908258.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-time monitoring of aerosol particle formation from sulfuric acid vapor at elevated concentrations and temperatures.在高浓度和高温条件下对硫酸蒸汽形成气溶胶颗粒的实时监测。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2022 Feb 23;24(8):5001-5013. doi: 10.1039/d1cp04580f.
2
Effect of Copper Sulfate and Sulfuric Acid on Blind Hole Filling of HDI Circuit Boards by Electroplating.硫酸铜和硫酸对HDI电路板电镀盲孔填充的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 27;14(1):85. doi: 10.3390/ma14010085.
3
Application of land-use regression models to estimate sound pressure levels and frequency components of road traffic noise in Taichung, Taiwan.
应用土地利用回归模型估计台湾台中市道路交通噪声的声压级和频率分量。
Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:104959. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104959. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Sulfuric acid at workplaces--applicability of the new Indicative Occupational Exposure Limit Value (IOELV) to thoracic particles.
J Environ Monit. 2012 Feb;14(2):440-5. doi: 10.1039/c2em10659k. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
5
Chemical burns: pathophysiology and treatment.化学烧伤:病理生理学与治疗
Burns. 2010 May;36(3):295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
6
What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models.你所看到的未必是你所得到的:回归类型模型中过拟合的简要非技术介绍。
Psychosom Med. 2004 May-Jun;66(3):411-21. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9.
7
Erosion of the teeth due to sulphuric acid in the battery industry.电池行业中硫酸导致的牙齿腐蚀。
Br J Ind Med. 1961 Jan;18(1):63-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.18.1.63.
8
Clinical and histopathological changes of the nasal mucosa induced by occupational exposure to sulphuric acid mists.职业性接触硫酸雾引起的鼻黏膜临床及组织病理学变化
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60(6):395-402. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.6.395.
9
Laryngeal cancer incidence among workers exposed to acid mists (United States).接触酸雾的工人中喉癌的发病率(美国)
Cancer Causes Control. 1997 Jan;8(1):34-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1018427003878.
10
Exposure assessment in industry specific retrospective occupational epidemiology studies.特定行业回顾性职业流行病学研究中的暴露评估。
Occup Environ Med. 1995 Oct;52(10):625-33. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.10.625.