• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰新诊断 HIV 感染者的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗启动:2016 年至 2020 年的回顾性分析。

First-line antiretroviral therapy initiation for newly diagnosed people with HIV in the Netherlands: A retrospective analysis from 2016 to 2020.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc Research Institute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 26;19(7):e0307963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307963. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307963
PMID:39058734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11280218/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

HIV treating physicians in the Netherlands follow the guidelines of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Most of these recommended initial regimens are single-tablet regimens (STRs), which incur higher costs. By the end of 2017, generic NRTI backbones had become widely available, offering a potentially cheaper multi-tablet regimen. This study aimed to evaluate guideline compliance in people with HIV who started antiretroviral therapy (ART), the uptake of generic multi-tablet regimens (gMTRs), and associated medication costs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Dutch HIV Monitoring Foundation to determine the proportion of treatment-naïve people entering care who initiated ART according to the DHHS and type of ART regimens prescribed between January 2016 and December 2020. We analyzed ART prescriptions, both at the national level and per individual HIV treatment centers. We calculated the monthly ART costs based on Dutch medicine prices listed on www.medicijnkosten.nl for each calendar year.

RESULTS

In 2016, an integrase inhibitor-containing regimen was initiated in 77.3% which increased to 87.8% in 2020. The compliance rate to DHHS-recommended initial regimens ranged from 82.8% in 2016 to 90.9% in 2020. Most patients received single-tablet regimens, 81.3% in 2016 to 60.3% in 2020. After the introduction the gMTRs showed a steady increase from 17.8% in 2018 to 37.8% in 2020. The cost of the first-line regimen per patient decreased by 22.9% in 2020 compared with 2017. The decrease was larger in centers where treatment-naïve individuals with HIV were preferentially initiated on a gMTR.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high compliance to the "DHHS-recommended initial regimens for most people with HIV" in the Netherlands. Most people who initiated ART received STRs, although the percentage of people who started on STRs gradually decreased over time. The use of gMTRs increased over time and was associated with lower medication costs.

摘要

简介

荷兰的 HIV 治疗医生遵循美国卫生与公众服务部 (DHHS) 的指南。这些建议的初始方案大多是单片方案 (STRs),费用较高。到 2017 年底,通用 NRTI 骨干药物已广泛可用,提供了一种潜在更便宜的多片方案。本研究旨在评估开始抗逆转录病毒治疗 (ART) 的 HIV 感染者的指南依从性、通用多片方案 (gMTRs) 的采用情况以及相关药物费用。

方法

本回顾性队列研究使用荷兰 HIV 监测基金会的数据,确定 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间进入护理的治疗初治人群中,根据 DHHS 以及所开 ART 方案的类型,开始接受 ART 的比例。我们分析了国家层面和每个 HIV 治疗中心的 ART 处方。我们根据每个日历年度在 www.medicijnkosten.nl 上列出的荷兰药品价格计算了每月的 ART 费用。

结果

2016 年,含有整合酶抑制剂的方案的起始率为 77.3%,到 2020 年增加到 87.8%。DHHS 推荐的初始方案的依从率从 2016 年的 82.8%到 2020 年的 90.9%。大多数患者接受单片方案,从 2016 年的 81.3%到 2020 年的 60.3%。gMTR 推出后,从 2018 年的 17.8%稳步上升到 2020 年的 37.8%。与 2017 年相比,2020 年每位患者的一线方案费用降低了 22.9%。在优先使用 gMTR 为 HIV 治疗初治患者的中心,降幅更大。

结论

荷兰“DHHS 推荐的大多数 HIV 感染者初始方案”的依从率很高。大多数开始接受 ART 的人接受了 STRs,尽管随着时间的推移,接受 STRs 的人数百分比逐渐下降。gMTR 的使用随着时间的推移而增加,并与较低的药物费用相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c91e/11280218/92f6b8d97425/pone.0307963.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c91e/11280218/3f3e5fea4b4f/pone.0307963.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c91e/11280218/92f6b8d97425/pone.0307963.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c91e/11280218/3f3e5fea4b4f/pone.0307963.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c91e/11280218/92f6b8d97425/pone.0307963.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
First-line antiretroviral therapy initiation for newly diagnosed people with HIV in the Netherlands: A retrospective analysis from 2016 to 2020.荷兰新诊断 HIV 感染者的一线抗逆转录病毒治疗启动:2016 年至 2020 年的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 26;19(7):e0307963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307963. eCollection 2024.
2
Rapid Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy Following Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Among Patients with Commercial Insurance Coverage.诊断人类免疫缺陷病毒感染后,商业保险覆盖人群中迅速开始抗逆转录病毒治疗。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):129-141. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19175. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Antiretroviral therapy adherence, medication use, and health care costs during 3 years of a community pharmacy medication therapy management program for Medi-Cal beneficiaries with HIV/AIDS.一项针对患有艾滋病毒/艾滋病的医疗补助受益者的社区药房药物治疗管理项目在3年期间的抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性、药物使用及医疗保健费用情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Apr;17(3):213-23. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.3.213.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Single- Versus Generic Multiple-Tablet Regimens for Treatment of HIV-1 Infection in the United States.美国单一片剂与通用多片剂方案治疗HIV-1感染的成本效益
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 25;11(1):e0147821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147821. eCollection 2016.
5
Real-world adherence and persistence for newly-prescribed HIV treatment: single versus multiple tablet regimen comparison among US medicaid beneficiaries.新处方 HIV 治疗的真实世界依从性和持久性:美国医疗补助受益人群中单一片剂与多片剂方案比较。
AIDS Res Ther. 2020 Apr 1;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12981-020-00268-1.
6
Reasons for noncompliance with the national guidelines for initial antiretroviral therapy of HIV-infected patients in Spain, 2010-2015.2010 - 2015年西班牙HIV感染患者初始抗逆转录病毒治疗未遵循国家指南的原因
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019 Nov;37(9):580-587. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Negative impact of a health insurer-mandated de-simplification from a single-tablet regimen to a two-tablet regimen.医疗保险机构强制将单一片剂方案改为双片剂方案对健康产生的负面影响。
AIDS. 2024 Jul 1;38(8):1257-1262. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003905. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
8
Adherence to antiretroviral therapy in managed care members in the United States: a retrospective claims analysis.美国管理式医疗成员对抗逆转录病毒疗法的依从性:一项回顾性索赔分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):86-92. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.86.
9
Real-World Health Plan Data Analysis: Key Trends in Medication Adherence and Overall Costs in Patients with HIV.真实世界健康计划数据分析:HIV 患者药物依从性和总体费用的主要趋势。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jan;25(1):88-93. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.1.088.
10
Long-Term Benefits of Rapid Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation in Reducing Medical and Overall Health Care Costs Among Medicaid-Covered Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.快速启动抗逆转录病毒治疗对减少医疗补助计划覆盖的艾滋病毒感染者的医疗和总体保健费用的长期效益。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):117-128. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19174. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Generic Antiretroviral Drugs and Single-Tablet Regimen De-Simplification for the Treatment of HIV Infection in Spain.西班牙使用非专利抗逆转录病毒药物和简化单片方案治疗 HIV 感染。
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2022 Jun;38(6):433-440. doi: 10.1089/AID.2021.0122. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Patient-reported outcomes among people living with HIV on single- versus multi-tablet regimens: Data from a real-life setting.HIV 感染者接受单片与多片方案治疗的患者报告结局:来自真实环境的数据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262533. eCollection 2022.
3
Cohort profile: the Netherlands Cohort Study on Acute HIV infection (NOVA), a prospective cohort study of people with acute or early HIV infection who immediately initiate HIV treatment.
队列资料简介:荷兰急性 HIV 感染队列研究(NOVA),是一项针对急性或早期 HIV 感染者的前瞻性队列研究,这些感染者立即开始接受 HIV 治疗。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e048582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048582.
4
Can we talk about price with patients when choosing antiretroviral therapy? A survey with people living with HIV and prescribers in France.在选择抗逆转录病毒疗法时,我们可以与患者讨论价格吗?法国的一项针对 HIV 感染者和处方者的调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 26;11(11):e046212. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046212.
5
Effectiveness and tolerability of dolutegravir and abacavir/lamivudine administered as two separate pills compared to their equivalent single-tablet regimen in a multicentre cohort in Spain.在西班牙的一项多中心队列研究中,与等效的单片制剂相比,将多替拉韦和阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定作为两种单独的药丸给药的有效性和耐受性。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Jul;24(7):e25758. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25758.
6
De-simplifying single-tablet antiretroviral treatments for cost savings in France: From the patient perspectives to a 6-month follow-up on generics.从患者角度出发,探讨法国降低单一片剂抗逆转录病毒治疗成本的方案:6 个月仿制药随访研究
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 25;15(9):e0239704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239704. eCollection 2020.
7
Physicians' opinions on generic antiretroviral drugs and single-tablet regimen de-simplification for the treatment of HIV infection: a multicentre survey in Spain.医生对抗逆转录病毒药物通用名和简化抗 HIV 感染的单片复方制剂方案的看法:西班牙多中心调查。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Feb 1;75(2):466-472. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz439.
8
Efficacy and safety of the switch of Triumeq to generic (abacavir + lamivudine) + Tivicay: data at 48 weeks.特威凯换用通用(阿巴卡韦+拉米夫定)+替诺福韦艾拉酚胺的疗效和安全性:48 周数据。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2019 Sep;51(9):691-693. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1637536. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
De-simplifying single-tablet antiretroviral treatments: uptake, risks and cost savings.去简化单片抗逆转录病毒治疗:接受度、风险和成本节约。
HIV Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):214-221. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12701. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Comparison of adherence to generic multi-tablet regimens vs. brand multi-tablet and brand single-tablet regimens likely to incorporate generic antiretroviral drugs by breaking or not fixed-dose combinations in HIV-infected patients.比较艾滋病毒感染患者中,通过拆分或不拆分固定剂量组合,服用通用多片方案与可能包含通用抗逆转录病毒药物的品牌多片方案及品牌单片方案的依从性。
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;32(4):450-458. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12363. Epub 2018 Apr 23.