National Center for Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health CArlos III, Madrid, Spain.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2022 Jun;38(6):433-440. doi: 10.1089/AID.2021.0122. Epub 2022 May 2.
The present study sought to describe the use of generic drugs and single-tablet regimen (STR) de-simplification for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection among 41 hospitals from the cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Research Network (CoRIS). In June 2018, we collected information on when generic antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) were introduced in the different hospitals, how the decisions to use them were made, and how the information was provided to the patients. Most of the nine available generic ARVs in Spain by June 2018 had been introduced in at least 85% of the participating hospitals, except for zidovudine (AZT)/lamivudine (3TC) and AZT. The time difference between the effective marketing date of each generic ARV and its first dispensing date in the hospitals was much shorter for the more recently approved generic ARV since the year 2017. However, only up to 20% of the hospitals de-simplified efavirenz (EFV)/tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC), dolutegravir (DTG)/abacavir (ABC)/3TC, and rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF/FTC (to generic EFV+TDF/FTC, DTG+generic ABC/3TC, and RPV+generic TDF/FTC, respectively), whereas the generic STR EFV/TDF/FTC was introduced in 87.8% of the centers. The median times between the date of effective marketing of generic TDF/FTC and the date of de-simplification of EFV/TDF/FTC and RPV/TDF/FTC were 723 [interquartile range (IQR): 369-1,119] and 234 (IQR: 142-264) days, respectively; this time was 155 (IQR: 28-287) days for de-simplification of DTG/ABC/3TC. In conclusion, despite the widespread use of generic ARVs, STRs de-simplification was only undertaken in <20% of the hospitals. There was wide variability in the timing of the introduction of each generic ARV after they were available in the market.
本研究旨在描述西班牙艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究网络(CoRIS)队列中 41 家医院在治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染方面使用通用药物和简化单片方案(STR)的情况。2018 年 6 月,我们收集了有关不同医院何时引入通用抗逆转录病毒药物(ARV)、如何做出使用这些药物的决定以及如何向患者提供信息的信息。截至 2018 年 6 月,西班牙市场上可用的 9 种通用 ARV 中,除齐多夫定(AZT)/拉米夫定(3TC)和 AZT 外,至少有 85%的参与医院已经引入了其中 9 种。自 2017 年以来,最近批准的通用 ARV 的有效营销日期与其在医院首次配药日期之间的时间差要短得多。然而,只有多达 20%的医院简化了依非韦伦(EFV)/替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)/恩曲他滨(FTC)、多替拉韦(DTG)/阿巴卡韦(ABC)/3TC 和利匹韦林(RPV)/TDF/FTC(分别简化为通用 EFV+TDF/FTC、DTG+通用 ABC/3TC 和 RPV+通用 TDF/FTC),而通用 STR EFV/TDF/FTC 则在 87.8%的中心引入。通用 TDF/FTC 营销日期与 EFV/TDF/FTC 和 RPV/TDF/FTC 简化日期之间的中位时间分别为 723[四分位距(IQR):369-1119]和 234(IQR:142-264)天;DTG/ABC/3TC 简化的中位时间为 155(IQR:28-287)天。结论:尽管广泛使用通用 ARV,但只有不到 20%的医院进行了 STR 简化。在市场上有通用药物后,每种通用 ARV 的引入时间差异很大。