South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Warwick Farm, New South Wales, Australia.
Aeromedical Operations, New South Wales Ambulance, Bankstown Aerodrome, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia; St George and Sutherland Clinical Schools, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;84:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.027. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
Fentanyl is often administered during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia (RSI) in the emergency department (ED) to ameliorate the hypertensive response that may occur. Due to its more rapid onset, the use of alfentanil may be more consistent with both the onset time of the sedative and the commencement of laryngoscopy. As such, we compared the effect of alfentanil and fentanyl on post-induction hemodynamic changes when administered as part of a standardized induction regimen including ketamine and rocuronium in ED RSI.
This was a double-blind pilot randomized controlled trial of adult patients requiring RSI in the ED of three urban Australian hospitals. Patients were randomized to receive either alfentanil or fentanyl in addition to ketamine and rocuronium for RSI. Non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate were measured immediately before and at two, four, and six minutes after induction. The primary outcome was the occurrence of at least one post-induction systolic blood pressure outside the pre-specified range of 100-160mmHg (with adjustment for patients with baseline hypertension). Secondary outcomes included hypertension, hypotension, hypoxia, first-pass intubation success, 30-day mortality, and the pattern of hemodynamic changes.
A total of 61 patients were included in the final analysis (31 in the alfentanil group and 30 in the fentanyl group). The primary outcome was met in 58% of the alfentanil group and 50% of the fentanyl group (difference 8%, 95% confidence interval: -17% to 33%). The 30-day mortality rate, first-pass success rate, and incidences of hypertension, hypotension, and hypoxia were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure or heart rate between the groups at any of the measured time-points.
Alfentanil and fentanyl produced comparable post-induction hemodynamic changes when used as adjuncts to ketamine in ED RSI. Future studies could consider comparing different dosages of these opioids.
在急诊科(ED)进行快速序贯诱导麻醉(RSI)时,常给予芬太尼以减轻可能发生的高血压反应。由于其起效更快,使用阿芬太尼可能更符合镇静剂的起效时间和喉镜检查的开始时间。因此,我们比较了在 ED RSI 中,作为包括氯胺酮和罗库溴铵的标准化诱导方案的一部分,给予阿芬太尼和芬太尼对诱导后血流动力学变化的影响。
这是一项在澳大利亚三个城市的三家医院的急诊科进行的成人患者需要 RSI 的双盲试点随机对照试验。患者被随机分为接受阿芬太尼或芬太尼加氯胺酮和罗库溴铵用于 RSI。在诱导前和诱导后 2、4 和 6 分钟测量非侵入性血压和心率。主要结局是至少发生一次诱导后收缩压超出预先指定的 100-160mmHg 范围(对基线高血压患者进行调整)。次要结局包括高血压、低血压、缺氧、首次插管成功、30 天死亡率和血流动力学变化模式。
共有 61 例患者纳入最终分析(阿芬太尼组 31 例,芬太尼组 30 例)。阿芬太尼组 58%和芬太尼组 50%达到主要结局(差异 8%,95%置信区间:-17%至 33%)。两组的 30 天死亡率、首次插管成功率以及高血压、低血压和缺氧的发生率相似。两组在任何测量时间点的收缩压或心率均无显著差异。
在 ED RSI 中,阿芬太尼和芬太尼与氯胺酮联合使用时,可产生类似的诱导后血流动力学变化。未来的研究可以考虑比较这些阿片类药物的不同剂量。