• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种透明的机器学习算法揭示了与 2 型糖尿病和二甲双胍单药治疗失败患者治疗惰性相关的 HbA1c 模式。

A transparent machine learning algorithm uncovers HbA1c patterns associated with therapeutic inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes and failure of metformin monotherapy.

机构信息

AMD-AI National Group Coordinator, UOS Integrating Primary and Specialist Care, ASST Nord Milano, Via Filippo Carcano 17, 20149 Milan, Italy.

Mix-x Partner, Via Circonvallazione 5, Ivrea (TO), Italy.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2024 Oct;190:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105550. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105550
PMID:39059083
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to identify and categorize the determinants influencing the intensification of therapy in Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) patients with suboptimal blood glucose control despite metformin monotherapy.

METHODS

Employing the Logic Learning Machine (LLM), an advanced artificial intelligence system, we scrutinized electronic health records of 1.5 million patients treated in 271 diabetes clinics affiliated with the Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists from 2005 to 2019. Inclusion criteria comprised patients on metformin monotherapy with two consecutive mean HbA1c levels exceeding 7.0%. The cohort was divided into "inertia-NO" (20,067 patients with prompt intensification) and "inertia-YES" (13,029 patients without timely intensification).

RESULTS

The LLM model demonstrated robust discriminatory ability among the two groups (ROC-AUC = 0.81, accuracy = 0.71, precision = 0.80, recall = 0.71, F1 score = 0.75). The main novelty of our results is indeed the identification of two main distinct subtypes of therapeutic inertia. The first exhibited a gradual but steady HbA1c increase, while the second featured a moderate, non-uniform rise with substantial fluctuations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis sheds light on the significant impact of HbA1c levels over time on therapeutic inertia in patients with T2D, emphasizing the importance of early intervention in the presence of specific HbA1c patterns.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定并分类影响 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者血糖控制不佳(尽管接受二甲双胍单药治疗)时强化治疗的决定因素。

方法

我们使用先进的人工智能系统逻辑学习机(LLM),对 2005 年至 2019 年间意大利医学糖尿病协会下属 271 家糖尿病诊所的 150 万名接受治疗的患者的电子健康记录进行了分析。纳入标准包括接受二甲双胍单药治疗且连续两次平均 HbA1c 水平超过 7.0%的患者。该队列分为“惰性-否”(20067 例患者迅速强化治疗)和“惰性-是”(13029 例患者未及时强化治疗)。

结果

LLM 模型在两组之间表现出较强的区分能力(ROC-AUC=0.81、准确率=0.71、精密度=0.80、召回率=0.71、F1 评分=0.75)。我们研究结果的主要新颖之处在于确定了两种主要的治疗惰性亚型。第一种表现为 HbA1c 逐渐但稳定地升高,而第二种则表现为中度、非均匀升高且波动较大。

结论

我们的分析揭示了 HbA1c 水平随时间推移对 T2D 患者治疗惰性的重大影响,强调了在存在特定 HbA1c 模式时早期干预的重要性。

相似文献

1
A transparent machine learning algorithm uncovers HbA1c patterns associated with therapeutic inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes and failure of metformin monotherapy.一种透明的机器学习算法揭示了与 2 型糖尿病和二甲双胍单药治疗失败患者治疗惰性相关的 HbA1c 模式。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Oct;190:105550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105550. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Transparent machine learning suggests a key driver in the decision to start insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes.透明机器学习提示 2 型糖尿病患者开始胰岛素治疗决策的关键驱动因素。
J Diabetes. 2023 Mar;15(3):224-236. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13361. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Patient and Provider Factors Affecting Clinical Inertia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Monotherapy.影响接受二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者临床惰性的患者及医疗服务提供者因素
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1658-1670.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
4
Factors associated with clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with metformin monotherapy.与二甲双胍单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者临床惰性相关的因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2063-2070. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1648116. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control.强化治疗改善血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的预后
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Sep;18(9):892-8. doi: 10.1111/dom.12683. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.一种使用电子健康记录数据预测2型糖尿病治疗惰性的机器学习模型。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Jun;47(6):1419-1433. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
7
Impact of time to treatment intensification on glycemic goal attainment among patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin monotherapy.二甲双胍单药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者强化治疗时间对血糖目标达成情况的影响。
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):831-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
8
Patterns of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiating second-line therapy after metformin monotherapy: Retrospective data for 10 256 individuals from the United Kingdom and Germany.二甲双胍单药治疗后起始二线治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制模式:来自英国和德国的 10256 个人的回顾性数据。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):389-399. doi: 10.1111/dom.13083. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Distance to glycemic goal at the time of treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus failing metformin monotherapy in the United States.在美国,二甲双胍单药治疗失败的 2 型糖尿病患者在强化治疗时的血糖目标达标距离。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 May;36(5):741-748. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1722623. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Intensification of Diabetes Therapy and Time Until A1C Goal Attainment Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Who Fail Metformin Monotherapy Within a Large Integrated Health System.在一个大型综合医疗体系中,对于新诊断为 2 型糖尿病且服用二甲双胍单药治疗失败的患者,强化糖尿病治疗与达到 A1C 目标的时间。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Sep;39(9):1527-34. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0227. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning and deep learning in diabetology: revolutionizing diabetes care.糖尿病学中的机器学习与深度学习:变革糖尿病护理
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2025 May 27;6:1547689. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1547689. eCollection 2025.