Quinones E E, Vermilyea S G, Griswold W H
J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Sep;54(3):359-61. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(85)90550-5.
The apparent bond strengths of four porcelains and five nonnoble alloys were determined. On the basis of the data, the following conclusions can be drawn: The use of Vita, Ceramco, or Will-Ceram porcelains with Rexillium III, Pentillium, or Bak-On-NP alloy gave similar bond strength values. With the exception of Unibond alloy, the bond strength values obtained with Biobond porcelain were lower than those obtained with the other porcelain materials. The ceramometal bond strength values obtained with Unibond alloy were similar with all of the porcelains tested. The continued availability of a bewildering array of new alloys and porcelains suggests the urgent need for research designed to determine the bonding mechanisms and compatibility of various porcelain-alloy combinations. The data from this investigation provide criteria for the rational selection of bond strength-compatible porcelains and alloys for clinical use.
测定了四种瓷和五种非贵金属合金的表观结合强度。根据这些数据，可以得出以下结论：使用维他瓷、西拉姆科瓷或威尔-赛拉姆瓷与雷西利姆III合金、彭蒂利姆合金或巴克-ON-NP合金，可得到相似的结合强度值。除了尤尼邦德合金外，使用生物结合瓷获得的结合强度值低于使用其他瓷材料获得的结合强度值。使用尤尼邦德合金获得的烤瓷合金结合强度值与所有测试瓷都相似。层出不穷的新型合金和瓷持续出现，这表明迫切需要开展研究，以确定各种瓷-合金组合的结合机制和兼容性。本研究的数据为临床合理选择结合强度相匹配的瓷和合金提供了标准。
