• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髁突颈部骨折的单钢板与双钢板固定:临床结果与生物力学模拟

Single versus Double Plate Fixation in Condylar Neck Fractures: Clinical Results and Biomechanics Simulation.

作者信息

Chen Chien-Chung, Chiu Ting-Han, Yan Cheng-Yu, Hou Ya-Pei, Lin Ting-Sheng

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;11(7):704. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070704.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering11070704
PMID:39061786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273754/
Abstract

The open reduction of mandibular condyle neck fractures is difficult due to the limited surgical field and complex facial nerve structures. The most effective fixation method for narrow fractured segments is debated as standard double four-hole plate fixation is often not feasible. This research compared bone stability and force resistance between single-long-plate and double-short-plate fixations using clinical outcomes, a Sawbones mandible model, and finite element analysis. In patients with condyle neck fractures, nine were fixed with single-long-plate and twelve with double-short-plate fixations, with no significant differences in malocclusion and facial palsy rates. In compression tests with a Sawbones model, displacements in the posterior part were similar in both fixation groups. In contrast, the anterior part had significantly higher displacements in the single-long-plate group. Finite element analysis showed higher displacements in both anterior and posterior parts in the single-plate group compared to the double-short-plate group. Maximum stresses were at the second screw hole in single-long-plate fixation and the turning point of the upper plate at the condyle neck in double-short-plate fixation. Double-short-plate fixations demonstrated better stability and force resistance than single-long-plate fixations.

摘要

由于手术视野有限和面部神经结构复杂,下颌髁突颈部骨折的切开复位术具有一定难度。对于狭窄骨折段,最有效的固定方法存在争议,因为标准的双四孔钢板固定通常不可行。本研究通过临床结果、Sawbones下颌骨模型和有限元分析,比较了单长钢板固定和双短钢板固定之间的骨稳定性和抗阻力。在髁突颈部骨折患者中,9例采用单长钢板固定,12例采用双短钢板固定,错牙合畸形和面神经麻痹发生率无显著差异。在Sawbones模型的压缩试验中,两个固定组后部的位移相似。相比之下,单长钢板组前部的位移明显更高。有限元分析表明,与双短钢板组相比,单钢板组的前部和后部位移均更高。单长钢板固定时最大应力出现在第二个螺孔处,双短钢板固定时最大应力出现在髁突颈部上板的转折点处。双短钢板固定比单长钢板固定表现出更好的稳定性和抗阻力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/cde4fed2c1e1/bioengineering-11-00704-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/4b41e2bf268f/bioengineering-11-00704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/4d3584794c87/bioengineering-11-00704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/19ae23455b25/bioengineering-11-00704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/55a13f40d147/bioengineering-11-00704-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/bd34d9213455/bioengineering-11-00704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/2c91f69e644e/bioengineering-11-00704-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/cde4fed2c1e1/bioengineering-11-00704-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/4b41e2bf268f/bioengineering-11-00704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/4d3584794c87/bioengineering-11-00704-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/19ae23455b25/bioengineering-11-00704-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/55a13f40d147/bioengineering-11-00704-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/bd34d9213455/bioengineering-11-00704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/2c91f69e644e/bioengineering-11-00704-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/485c/11273754/cde4fed2c1e1/bioengineering-11-00704-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Single versus Double Plate Fixation in Condylar Neck Fractures: Clinical Results and Biomechanics Simulation.髁突颈部骨折的单钢板与双钢板固定:临床结果与生物力学模拟
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;11(7):704. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070704.
2
Biomechanical study on parallel cannulated compression screw combined with medial buttress plate fixation and F-type cannulated compression screw fixation in Pauwels III femoral neck fracture:A finite element analysis.平行空心加压螺钉联合内侧支撑钢板固定与 F 型空心加压螺钉固定治疗 Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的生物力学研究:有限元分析。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Aug 28;47(8):1143-1153. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.220022.
3
"A" shape plate for open rigid internal fixation of mandible condyle neck fracture.用于下颌骨髁突颈部骨折切开坚固内固定的“A”形钢板
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;42(6):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
4
Does lag screw fixation of condylar fractures result in adequate stability? A finite element analysis.髁突骨折的拉力螺钉固定是否能达到足够的稳定性?有限元分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;46(6):1041-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Comparison of Neck Screw and Conventional Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Condyle Fractures Using 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.使用三维有限元分析比较下颌髁突骨折中颈部螺钉与传统固定技术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
Application of the lambda plate on condylar fractures: Finite element evaluation of the fixation rigidity for different fracture patterns and plate placements.lambda 板在髁突骨折中的应用:不同骨折类型和钢板放置方式的固定刚度的有限元评估。
Injury. 2022 Apr;53(4):1345-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.032. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
Evaluation of internal fixation techniques for extracapsular fracture: A finite element analysis and comparison.评价囊外骨折内固定技术:有限元分析与比较。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Oct;225:107072. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107072. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
8
Finite element analysis of 3 internal fixations for distal type C3 femur fractures with medial wall bone defects.伴有内侧壁骨缺损的C3型股骨远端骨折三种内固定方式的有限元分析
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Nov 28;48(11):1711-1720. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230221.
9
Parallel analysis of finite element model controlled trial and retrospective case control study on percutaneous internal fixation for vertical sacral fractures.有限元模型对照试验与回顾性病例对照研究并行分析经皮内固定治疗垂直骶骨骨折。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jul 23;14:217. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-217.
10
Open Rigid Internal Fixation of Low-Neck Condylar Fractures of the Mandible: Mechanical Comparison of 16 Plate Designs.下颌骨低颈部髁突骨折的开放性坚固内固定:16种接骨板设计的力学比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 22;13(8):1953. doi: 10.3390/ma13081953.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Mandibular Muscle Variations Following Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review.髁突骨折后下颌肌肉变化的分析:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 12;12(18):5925. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185925.
2
Evaluation of occlusal forces using T scan analysis following mandibular fracture fixation.下颌骨骨折固定后使用T扫描分析评估咬合力。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jan-Apr;14(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_143_22. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Comparative Benefits of Open versus Closed Reduction of Condylar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
髁突骨折切开复位与闭合复位的比较优势:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):664e-672e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010009. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Pre-auricular Transparotid Approach for the Management of Mandibular Condylar Fracture: An Experience of 82 Cases.耳前经腮腺入路治疗下颌髁突骨折:82例经验
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Sep;21(3):916-922. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01565-6. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
5
Comparative evaluation of bite force in patients treated for unilateral mandibular condylar fractures by open and closed methods.采用开放和闭合方法治疗单侧下颌髁突骨折患者咬合力的比较评估
Dent Traumatol. 2022 Jun;38(3):223-228. doi: 10.1111/edt.12733. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
6
Biomechanical Evaluation and Factorial Analysis of the 3-Dimensional Printing Self-Designed Metallic Reconstruction Plate for Mandibular Segmental Defect.三维打印自行设计的金属重建板在下颌骨节段性缺损中的生物力学评估及析因分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Apr;80(4):775-783. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.11.022. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
7
Comparison of therapeutic results of closed and open repair of mandibular condylar fractures.下颌髁突骨折闭合复位与开放复位治疗效果的比较。
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Oct 15;11(5):385-390. eCollection 2021.
8
Mandibular Condylar Fractures.下颌骨髁突骨折。
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;30(1):85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2021.08.007.
9
Towards a consensus for classification of mandibular condyle fractures.朝向关于下颌骨髁突骨折分类的共识。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;49(4):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.双侧矢状劈开截骨固定改良新技术的研究:有限元分析与体外生物力学试验。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jun 17;2020:8707389. doi: 10.1155/2020/8707389. eCollection 2020.