The Combined Immunohistochemical Expression of GLI1 and BCOR in Synovial Sarcomas for the Identification of Three Risk Groups and Their Prognostic Outcomes: A Study of 52 Patients.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a rare soft-tissue tumor characterized by a monomorphic blue spindle cell histology and variable epithelial differentiation. Morphologically, SSs may be confused with other sarcomas. Systemic treatment is more effective for patients with high-risk SSs, patients with advanced disease, and younger patients. However, further studies are required to find new prognostic biomarkers. Herein, we describe the morphological, molecular, and clinical findings, using a wide immunohistochemical panel, of a series of SS cases. We studied 52 cases confirmed as SSs by morphological diagnosis and/or molecular studies. Clinical data (gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, resection margins, adjuvant treatment, recurrences, metastasis, and survival) were also retrieved for each patient. All the available H&E slides were examined by four pathologists. Three tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed for each of the tumors, and a wide immunohistochemical panel was performed. For time-to-event variables, survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing, or Cox regression. Statistical significance was considered at < 0.05. The mean age of our patients was 40.33, and the median was 40.5 years. We found a predominance of males versus females (1.7:1). The most frequent morphological subtype was monophasic. TRPS1, SS18-SSX, and SSX-C-terminus were positive in 96% of cases. GLI1 expression was strong in six and focal (cytoplasmic) in twenty patients. Moreover, BCOR was expressed in more than half of SSs. Positive expression of both proteins, BCOR and GLI1, was correlated with a worse prognosis. Multivariate analysis was also performed, but only BCOR expression appeared to be significant. The combination of GLI1 and BCOR antibodies can be used to group SSs into three risk groups (low, intermediate, and high risk). We hypothesize that these findings could identify which patients would benefit from receiving adjuvant treatment and which would not. Moreover, these markers could represent therapeutic targets in advanced stages. However, further, larger series of SSs and molecular studies are necessary to corroborate our present findings.