Suppr超能文献

CBD 与 CBDP:体外受体结合活性比较。

CBD Versus CBDP: Comparing In Vitro Receptor-Binding Activities.

机构信息

Nalu Bio Inc., 38 Keyes Avenue, Suite 117, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA.

Charlotte's Web, 700 Tech Court, Louisville, CO 80027, USA.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 15;25(14):7724. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147724.

Abstract

Phytocannabinoids with seven-carbon alkyl chains (phorols) have gained a lot of attention, as they are commonly believed to be more potent versions of typical cannabinoids with shorter alkyl chains. At the time of this article, cannabidiphorol (CBDP) and tetrahydrocannabiphorol (THCP) can both be purchased in the North American market, even though their biological activities are nearly unknown. To investigate their relative potency, we conducted in vitro receptor-binding experiments with CBDP (cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor antagonism, serotonin 5HT-1A agonism, dopamine D2S (short form) agonism, and mu-opioid negative allosteric modulation) and compared the observed activity with that of CBD. To our knowledge, this is the first publication to investigate CBDP's receptor activity in vitro. A similar activity profile was observed for both CBD and CBDP, with the only notable difference at the CB2 receptor. Contrary to common expectations, CBD was found to be a slightly more potent CB2 antagonist than CBDP ( < 0.05). At the highest tested concentration, CBD demonstrated antagonist activity with a 33% maximum response of SR144528 (selective CB2 antagonist/inverse agonist). CBDP at the same concentration produced a weaker antagonist activity. A radioligand binding assay revealed that among cannabinoid and serotonin receptors, CB2 is likely the main biological target of CBDP. However, both CBD and CBDP were found to be significantly less potent than SR144528. The interaction of CBDP with the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) produced unexpected results. Although the cannabidiol family is considered to be a set of negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of opioid receptors, we observed a significant increase in met-enkephalin-induced mu-opioid internalization when cells were incubated with 3 µM of CBDP and 1 µM met-enkephalin, a type of activity expected from positive allosteric modulators (PAMs). To provide a structural explanation for the observed PAM effect, we conducted molecular docking simulations. These simulations revealed the co-binding potential of CBDP (or CBD) and met-enkephalin to the MOR.

摘要

具有七个碳烷基链的植物大麻素(腐醇)引起了广泛关注,因为它们通常被认为是具有较短烷基链的典型大麻素的更有效版本。在本文撰写之时,大麻二酚腐醇(CBDP)和四氢大麻酚腐醇(THCP)均可在北美市场购买,尽管它们的生物活性几乎未知。为了研究它们的相对效力,我们进行了 CBDP 的体外受体结合实验(大麻素 CB1/CB2 受体拮抗作用、血清素 5HT-1A 激动作用、多巴胺 D2S(短形式)激动作用和μ-阿片受体负变构调节),并将观察到的活性与 CBD 进行了比较。据我们所知,这是第一篇研究 CBDP 体外受体活性的出版物。CBD 和 CBDP 表现出相似的活性谱,唯一明显的区别是在 CB2 受体上。与普遍的预期相反,CBD 被发现是一种比 CBDP 略强的 CB2 拮抗剂(<0.05)。在测试的最高浓度下,CBD 对 SR144528(选择性 CB2 拮抗剂/反向激动剂)的最大反应显示出 33%的拮抗剂活性。相同浓度的 CBDP 产生较弱的拮抗剂活性。放射性配体结合测定表明,在大麻素和血清素受体中,CB2 可能是 CBDP 的主要生物学靶标。然而,CBD 和 CBDP 都被发现明显不如 SR144528 有效。CBDP 与μ-阿片受体(MOR)的相互作用产生了意想不到的结果。尽管大麻二酚家族被认为是一组阿片受体的负变构调节剂(NAM),但当用 3 µM 的 CBDP 和 1 µM 的 met-enkephalin(一种内源性阿片肽)孵育细胞时,我们观察到 met-enkephalin 诱导的μ-阿片受体内化显著增加,这种活动预计是正变构调节剂(PAM)的作用。为了对观察到的 PAM 效应提供结构解释,我们进行了分子对接模拟。这些模拟显示了 CBDP(或 CBD)和 met-enkephalin 与 MOR 的共结合潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e680/11277192/b105c3857e62/ijms-25-07724-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验