Silawal Sandeep, Gesslein Markus, Willauschus Maximilian, Schulze-Tanzil Gundula
Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg and Salzburg, General Hospital Nuremberg, Prof. Ernst Nathan Str. 1, 90419 Nuremberg, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg and Salzburg, General Hospital Nuremberg, Breslauer Str. 201, 90471 Nuremberg, Germany.
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 29;14(7):701. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070701.
Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMF) is gaining more attention as a non-invasive arthritis treatment. In our study, immortalized synovial fibroblasts (K4IM) derived from a non-arthritic donor were exposed to MAGCELL ARTHRO, a PEMF device, with 105 mT intensity, 8 Hz frequency, and 2 × 2.5 min sessions conducted thrice with a 1 h interval, to understand the underlying mechanism in regard to the complement system. Additionally, tumor necrosis factor (TNFα, 10 ng/mL) pre-treatment prior to PEMF stimulation, as well as 3-day versus 6-day stimulation, were compared. Gene expression of C4b binding protein-alpha and -beta (C4BPα, C4BPβ), complement factor (CF)-H, CFI, CD55, CD59, Interleukin (IL-6) and TNFα was analyzed. Immunofluorescence staining of CD55, CD59, and Ki67 was conducted. Results showed the absence of C4BPα gene expression, but C4BPβ was present. One and three days of PEMF stimulation caused no significant changes. However, after six days, there was a significant increase in CD55, CFH, and CD59 gene expression, indicating cytoprotective effects. Conversely, IL-6 gene expression increased after six days of stimulation and even after a single session in TNFα pre-stimulated cells, indicating a pro-inflammatory effect. PEMF's ambivalent, i.e., enhancing complement regulatory proteins and pro-inflammatory cytokines, highlights its complexity at the molecular level.
脉冲电磁场刺激(PEMF)作为一种非侵入性关节炎治疗方法正受到越来越多的关注。在我们的研究中,将来自非关节炎供体的永生化滑膜成纤维细胞(K4IM)暴露于PEMF设备MAGCELL ARTHRO下,其强度为105 mT,频率为8 Hz,每次2×2.5分钟,共进行三次,间隔1小时,以了解补体系统的潜在机制。此外,还比较了PEMF刺激前肿瘤坏死因子(TNFα,10 ng/mL)预处理以及3天与6天刺激的效果。分析了C4b结合蛋白α和β(C4BPα、C4BPβ)、补体因子(CF)-H、CFI、CD55、CD59、白细胞介素(IL-6)和TNFα的基因表达。进行了CD55、CD59和Ki67的免疫荧光染色。结果显示不存在C4BPα基因表达,但存在C4BPβ。PEMF刺激1天和3天未引起显著变化。然而,6天后,CD55、CFH和CD59基因表达显著增加,表明具有细胞保护作用。相反,刺激6天后以及TNFα预刺激细胞单次刺激后IL-6基因表达增加,表明具有促炎作用。PEMF的矛盾之处,即增强补体调节蛋白和促炎细胞因子,突出了其在分子水平上的复杂性。