• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准全踝关节置换术与定制器械:一项比较研究。

Standard Total Ankle Arthroplasty vs. Patient-Specific Instrumentation: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Arceri Alberto, Abdi Pejman, Mazzotti Antonio, Zielli Simone Ottavio, Artioli Elena, Langone Laura, Sgubbi Federico, Faldini Cesare

机构信息

1st Orthopaedics and Traumatologic Clinic, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40123 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 19;14(7):770. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070770.

DOI:10.3390/jpm14070770
PMID:39064024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278035/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aims to compare surgical outcomes between two cohorts of patients who underwent total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) using either standard technique or patient-specific instrumentation (PSI).

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who affected of end-staged ankle osteoarthritis were retrospectively assessed and divided into two groups based on TAA techniques: a TAA standard technique group and a TAA-using PSI group. The two groups were compared in terms of operative time, additional procedures, complications (neurovascular and wound problems, infection, loosening and osteolysis, revision and explantation rates, and perioperative fracture), clinical scores, and range of motion (ROM).

RESULT

Fifty-one patients underwent standard TAA, while 13 patients underwent TAA with PSI. At 1-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups ( > 0.05). AOFAS scores were similar, with the standard TAA group scoring 83.33 ± 7.55 and the PSI group scoring 82.92 ± 9.7 ( = 0.870). Likewise, the postoperative ROM did not differ significantly, with 15.12 ± 7.6 degrees for the standard TAA group and 16.05 ± 6.7 degrees for the PSI group ( = 0.689). However, the standard TAA group experienced significantly longer operative time (107.1 ± 22.1 min) compared to the PSI group (91.92 ± 22.9 min, = 0.032). Additionally, the standard TAA group required more adjunctive procedures (29.7%) compared to the PSI group (7.7%, = 0.04). Residual pain was also more frequently reported in the standard TAA group (62.7%) than in the PSI group (30.7%, = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

While both techniques resulted in comparable complication rates, clinical scores and ROM, the PSI group reported significantly shorter operative time and less residual pain, thus requiring fewer postoperative procedures.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在比较两组接受全踝关节置换术(TAA)的患者的手术结果,这两组患者分别采用标准技术或定制器械(PSI)。

方法

对一系列连续性的终末期踝关节骨关节炎患者进行回顾性评估,并根据TAA技术分为两组:TAA标准技术组和使用PSI的TAA组。比较两组的手术时间、附加手术、并发症(神经血管和伤口问题、感染、松动和骨溶解、翻修和取出率以及围手术期骨折)、临床评分和活动范围(ROM)。

结果

51例患者接受了标准TAA,13例患者接受了使用PSI的TAA。在1年随访时,两组并发症发生率无显著差异(>0.05)。美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分相似,标准TAA组评分为83.33±7.55,PSI组评分为82.92±9.7(=0.870)。同样,术后ROM差异不显著,标准TAA组为15.12±7.6度,PSI组为16.05±6.7度(=0.689)。然而,与PSI组(91.92±22.9分钟,=0.032)相比,标准TAA组的手术时间明显更长(107.1±22.1分钟)。此外,标准TAA组需要更多的辅助手术(29.7%),而PSI组为(7.7%,=0.04)。标准TAA组残留疼痛的报告频率也高于PSI组(62.7%对30.7%,=0.038)。

结论

虽然两种技术的并发症发生率、临床评分和ROM相当,但PSI组的手术时间明显更短,残留疼痛更少,因此术后所需手术更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/9d746b0ebdaf/jpm-14-00770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/f456446d574f/jpm-14-00770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/a56560b1cca4/jpm-14-00770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/9d746b0ebdaf/jpm-14-00770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/f456446d574f/jpm-14-00770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/a56560b1cca4/jpm-14-00770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fdc/11278035/9d746b0ebdaf/jpm-14-00770-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Standard Total Ankle Arthroplasty vs. Patient-Specific Instrumentation: A Comparative Study.标准全踝关节置换术与定制器械:一项比较研究。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 19;14(7):770. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070770.
2
Does Patient-Specific Instrumentation Have a Higher Rate of Early Osteolysis Than Standard Referencing Techniques in Total Ankle Arthroplasty? A Radiographic Analysis.在全踝关节置换术中,个性化器械的早期骨溶解发生率是否高于标准参照技术?一项影像学分析。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2020 Feb;13(1):32-42. doi: 10.1177/1938640019828069. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Patient Specific Versus Standard Instrumentation.全踝关节置换术的患者报告结局:患者特异性与标准器械比较。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2024 Feb;17(1_suppl):30S-37S. doi: 10.1177/19386400231179124. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Total ankle arthroplasty incorporating a total talar prosthesis: a comparative study against the standard total ankle arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术中结合全距骨假体:与标准全踝关节置换术的对比研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Apr;101-B(4):443-446. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-0812.R2.
5
Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs Standard Referencing in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Radiologic Outcome.患者特异性器械与全踝关节置换中的标准参照:放射学结果比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jun;43(6):741-749. doi: 10.1177/10711007221077100. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty: A comparative study.全踝关节置换术中患者特异性器械的准确性:一项比较研究。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Jun;25(3):383-389. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
7
Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous or Sequential Bilateral Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Comparative Cohort Study.同期与序贯双侧全踝关节置换术的临床疗效和并发症:一项单中心的对比队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Oct 5;104(19):1712-1721. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00072. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
Total Ankle Arthroplasty Radiographic Alignment Comparison Between Patient-Specific Instrumentation and Standard Instrumentation.全踝关节置换术中患者特异性与标准器械的影像学对线比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jul;42(7):851-858. doi: 10.1177/1071100721996379. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
Intraoperative and perioperative complications during revision arthroplasty for salvage of a failed total ankle arthroplasty.为挽救失败的全踝关节置换术而进行翻修关节成形术时的术中和围手术期并发症。
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Feb;36(2):135-42. doi: 10.1177/1071100714554452. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for the Treatment of End-Stage Ankle Arthritis in the Last Decade: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.过去十年中全踝关节置换术与踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节炎的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Sep-Oct;59(5):1032-1039. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.008. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Are We Ready for Pseudotumors in Total Ankle Arthroplasty? A Case Report.我们是否为全踝关节置换术中的假肿瘤做好准备了?一例病例报告。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 20;14(2):649. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020649.
2
Impact of Joint Line Level in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Standard Techniques vs Patient-Specific Instruments.关节线水平在全踝关节置换术中的影响:标准技术与定制器械对比
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024 Dec 16;9(4):24730114241303474. doi: 10.1177/24730114241303474. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigation of contact behavior on a model of the dual-mobility artificial hip joint for Asians in different inner liner thicknesses.不同内衬厚度下亚洲人双动人工髋关节模型的接触行为研究。
World J Orthop. 2024 Apr 18;15(4):321-336. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i4.321.
2
The Effect of Tibiotalar Joint Line Level Alterations on Tibiotalar Range of Motion Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术后胫距关节线水平改变对胫距关节活动范围的影响
Foot Ankle Int. 2024 Jan;45(1):20-29. doi: 10.1177/10711007231199963. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Accuracy of a Patient-Specific Total Ankle Arthroplasty Instrumentation.
患者特异性全踝关节置换术器械的准确性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Nov;44(11):1150-1157. doi: 10.1177/10711007231194049. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
4
Return to sports after total ankle arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全踝关节置换术后恢复运动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2023 Sep 2;44:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.001. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Custom-made total ankle arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation for severe bone loss conditions: a case series.定制型个体化全踝关节置换术治疗严重骨缺损:病例系列研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03658-z. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Patient Specific Versus Standard Instrumentation.全踝关节置换术的患者报告结局:患者特异性与标准器械比较。
Foot Ankle Spec. 2024 Feb;17(1_suppl):30S-37S. doi: 10.1177/19386400231179124. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle.全髋关节置换术后双动头臼在步态周期下的三维模型中的接触压力分析
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):3564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30725-6.
8
Early-Term Results of the Cadence Total Ankle Prosthesis: An European Noninventor Study.Cadence全踝关节假体的早期结果:一项欧洲非发明者研究
Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Jan;44(1):1-12. doi: 10.1177/10711007221136539. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty.全踝关节置换术中的个性化器械
World J Orthop. 2022 Mar 18;13(3):230-237. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i3.230.
10
Patient-Specific Instrumentation vs Standard Referencing in Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Comparison of the Radiologic Outcome.患者特异性器械与全踝关节置换中的标准参照:放射学结果比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2022 Jun;43(6):741-749. doi: 10.1177/10711007221077100. Epub 2022 Feb 24.