Suppr超能文献

纳武利尤单抗治疗后接受靶向治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的临床疗效:一项真实世界研究。

Clinical Effectiveness of Targeted Therapies Following Nivolumab Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Health Science University, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul 34865, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 2;60(7):1088. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071088.

Abstract

: The treatment and escape for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has rapidly evolved, particularly with the integration of immune therapies into first-line regimens. However, optimal strategies following progression in first-line immunotherapy remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of axitinib and cabozantinib as third-line therapies after progression on nivolumab following first-line VEGF-TKI therapy. : Patients with metastatic RCC who progressed on prior nivolumab treatment after receiving first-line VEGF-TKI therapy were included. Data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected. Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes. : A total of 46 patients were included who were predominantly male (83%) with clear-cell histology (89%). The median PFS on first-line TKI therapy was 10.2 months. All the patients received nivolumab as a second-line therapy, with a median of 12 cycles. The median second-line PFS was seven months. Third-line therapies included axitinib (24 patients) and cabozantinib (20 patients). The median PFS for axitinib and cabozantinib was six months, with comparable survival outcomes. The IMDC risk group and treatment tolerability were significant predictors of survival in multivariate analysis. Adverse events were manageable, with hypertension, fatigue, and diarrhea being the most common. : Axitinib and cabozantinib show promise as third-line therapies post-nivolumab progression in metastatic RCC, though prospective validation is warranted. This study underscores the need for further research to establish treatment standards in this evolving landscape.

摘要

: 转移性肾细胞癌 (RCC) 的治疗和逃逸方法已经迅速发展,尤其是免疫疗法已被纳入一线治疗方案。然而,一线免疫治疗进展后的最佳策略仍不确定。本研究旨在评估阿昔替尼和卡博替尼作为一线 VEGF-TKI 治疗后纳武利尤单抗进展后的三线治疗的疗效和安全性。 : 纳入了一线 VEGF-TKI 治疗后接受纳武利尤单抗治疗进展的转移性 RCC 患者。收集了患者特征、治疗方案、缓解率、无进展生存期 (PFS) 和总生存期 (OS) 的数据。进行了统计分析以评估预后因素和治疗结果。 : 共纳入 46 例患者,其中大多数为男性 (83%),组织学类型为透明细胞癌 (89%)。一线 TKI 治疗的中位 PFS 为 10.2 个月。所有患者均接受纳武利尤单抗二线治疗,中位治疗 12 个周期。二线 PFS 的中位时间为 7 个月。三线治疗包括阿昔替尼 (24 例) 和卡博替尼 (20 例)。阿昔替尼和卡博替尼的中位 PFS 均为 6 个月,生存结局相当。多变量分析显示,IMDC 风险组和治疗耐受性是生存的显著预测因素。不良反应可管理,最常见的是高血压、疲劳和腹泻。 : 在转移性 RCC 中,纳武利尤单抗进展后阿昔替尼和卡博替尼作为三线治疗具有潜力,但需要前瞻性验证。本研究强调需要进一步研究,以在这一不断发展的领域建立治疗标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2891/11278662/c7108affb2bf/medicina-60-01088-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验