• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物理治疗师对医疗保健和康复领域人工智能的看法和态度:一项定性研究。

Physical therapists' perceptions and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in healthcare and rehabilitation: A qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Oct;73:103152. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103152. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103152
PMID:39067366
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being introduced to rehabilitation practices, and it can optimize the patient's outcome through their ability to design personalized care strategies and interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To understand the attitudes and perceptions of physical therapy professionals on the use of AI in rehabilitation in regard to treatment planning, diagnosis, outcome prediction, and advantages and disadvantages.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This paper followed an exploratory, qualitative research design. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews were conducted with participants of different experience levels and specialties in physical therapy. Results were evaluated using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: (i) perceptions of AI and its applications in healthcare services, (ii) impact on the workforce (iii) considerations around implementing AI within rehabilitation and (iv) AI, and the fast-approaching future. Participants shared views on the potential impact of AI on rehabilitation practices, such as aiding the decision-making process, saving time and effort of both the therapist and patients. Participants have stressed on potential pitfalls that still need to be considered, such as patient data privacy, potential loss of patient-healthcare practitioner relationship, ethical concerns regarding overreliance on these applications and how that might hinder effective patient care.

CONCLUSION

The findings add to the literature about physical therapists' understanding regarding the use of AI in patient care. Several concerns were raised to the adoption of AI, including concerns about patient privacy, and ethical concerns. Based on the study findings, researchers emphasize the importance of establishing guidelines when incorporating AI in rehabilitation to improve the therapist's knowledge and skills.

摘要

背景

人工智能(AI)正被引入康复实践中,它可以通过设计个性化的护理策略和干预措施来优化患者的治疗效果。

目的

了解物理治疗专业人员对 AI 在康复中的应用(如治疗计划、诊断、结果预测)的态度和看法,包括对 AI 的优势和劣势的认识。

设计和方法

本文采用探索性、定性研究设计。对具有不同经验水平和专业背景的物理治疗师进行了半结构化的一对一访谈。使用主题分析对结果进行评估。

结果

确定了四个主题:(i)对 AI 及其在医疗保健服务中的应用的看法,(ii)对劳动力的影响,(iii)在康复中实施 AI 的考虑因素,以及(iv)AI 和即将到来的未来。参与者分享了他们对 AI 对康复实践潜在影响的看法,例如帮助决策过程、节省治疗师和患者的时间和精力。参与者强调了仍需考虑的潜在陷阱,例如患者数据隐私、患者与医疗保健从业者关系可能受到的潜在影响、过度依赖这些应用程序的伦理问题以及这可能如何阻碍有效的患者护理。

结论

研究结果增加了关于物理治疗师对 AI 在患者护理中应用的理解的文献。对采用 AI 提出了一些担忧,包括对患者隐私和伦理问题的担忧。基于研究结果,研究人员强调在康复中引入 AI 时制定指南的重要性,以提高治疗师的知识和技能。

相似文献

1
Physical therapists' perceptions and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in healthcare and rehabilitation: A qualitative study.物理治疗师对医疗保健和康复领域人工智能的看法和态度:一项定性研究。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Oct;73:103152. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103152. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Physical Therapists' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care and Rehabilitation: Cross-sectional Study.物理治疗师对医疗保健和康复人工智能应用的知识和态度:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 20;24(10):e39565. doi: 10.2196/39565.
3
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
4
Experiences of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative study of UK clinician and key stakeholder perspectives.在医疗保健中使用人工智能的体验:英国临床医生和主要利益相关者观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 11;13(12):e076950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076950.
5
Expectations and attitudes towards medical artificial intelligence: A qualitative study in the field of stroke.对医疗人工智能的期望和态度:中风领域的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0279088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279088. eCollection 2023.
6
Clinicians' roles and necessary levels of understanding in the use of artificial intelligence: A qualitative interview study with German medical students.临床医生在使用人工智能方面的角色和必要的理解水平:一项对德国医学生的定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 7;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01109-w.
7
Importance of a patient-centred approach in ensuring quality of post-fracture rehabilitation for working aged people: A qualitative study of therapists' and patients' perspectives.以患者为中心的方法在确保劳动年龄人群骨折后康复质量中的重要性:一项关于治疗师和患者观点的定性研究
Work. 2016;55(4):831-839. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162446.
8
Patients' Views on AI for Risk Prediction in Shared Decision-Making for Knee Replacement Surgery: Qualitative Interview Study.患者对人工智能在膝关节置换手术共享决策风险预测中的看法:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e43632. doi: 10.2196/43632.
9
Navigating the ethical landscape of artificial intelligence in radiography: a cross-sectional study of radiographers' perspectives.医学影像学中人工智能伦理问题的探索:放射技师观点的横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 11;25(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01052-w.
10
Facilitators and Barriers of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Method Approach.人工智能在康复中的应用的促进因素和障碍:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 29;19(23):15919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315919.

引用本文的文献

1
Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Rehabilitation: Perceptions, Knowledge, and Challenges Among Healthcare Providers.人工智能在康复领域的应用:医疗服务提供者的认知、知识与挑战
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;13(4):350. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040350.