Multivessel revascularization in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 182,798 patients.

BACKGROUND

Patients experiencing non-ST segment elevation acute-coronary-syndromes (NSTE-ACS) often present with multivessel-coronary-artery-disease (MVD). An immediate complete multivessel revascularization (MVR) - within the index hospitalization - may be considered the default therapeutic strategy, although its risk-to-benefit profile has not been definitively established through dedicated clinical trials.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines, was conducted to assess studies comparing immediate MVR versus a conservative culprit-only revascularization (COR) in NSTE-ACS with MVD. The main endpoints were all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). The incidence of any revascularization or further percutaneous-coronary-interventions (PCIs) were also collected. The primary analyses for the main endpoints were conducted on propensity-matched groups only.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies (182,798 patients) were identified. 7 studies, encompassing 11,372 patients, were included in the primary analysis of propensity score-matched groups. Immediate MVR significantly increased (28%) survival (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.90, P < 0.01) along with a 35% reduction in MACE (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.88, P = 0.01) and a 60% decrease in MI (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25-0.63, P < 0.01) during a mean 3-years follow-up compared to the propensity score-matched COR group. Results were consistent in the unmatched analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports an immediate MVR for improving clinical outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS and MVD as compared to a conservative immediate COR. These data prompt further evaluations regarding optimal strategies in the pursuit of MVR, including patient selection, revascularization modality, and assessment methods of revascularization completeness.