Suppr超能文献

神经性疼痛试验中基于每日与单周回忆的疼痛质量评估均值:对检测灵敏度的影响

Mean of Daily Versus Single Week Recall-Based Pain Quality Assessments in Neuropathic Pain Trials: Implications for Assay Sensitivity.

作者信息

Rangel Madelaine, Besharat Soroush, Sohn Michael B, Foust Melyssa, Francar Lori, Jorgensen Carla, Mustian Karen, Morrow Gary, Culakova Eva, Jensen Mark P, Langford Dale J, Gewandter Jennifer S

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

J Pain. 2024 Nov;25(11):104643. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104643. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

Patients with neuropathic pain often present with variable pain and nonpainful sensory qualities that could serve as outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This study aimed to investigate the within-participant variability in the severity of these sensory qualities and whether the means of 7 daily pain quality assessments provide better assay sensitivity (ie, more sensitivity to treatment effects) than single-week recall-based assessments. This secondary analysis used data from an RCT of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (N = 142). Participants rated the severity of painful and nonpainful sensory qualities using 0 to 10 numeric rating scales daily for 1 week (24-hour recall) and 1 time at the end of each week (week recall) at trial baseline and endpoint (after 6 weeks of treatment). For pain quality assay sensitivity analyses, the 2 types of measures were used to 1) define the study sample (ie, how many participants met minimum baseline pain quality severity) and 2) calculate the observed effect sizes (ie, between-group differences in mean pain qualities) using analysis of covariances. The projected sample sizes required to detect the observed effect sizes in future clinical trials for hot/burning pain and cramping were substantially smaller using the daily mean outcome compared with week recall (ie, hot/burning pain: 153 vs 388, cramping: 121 vs 349), and only marginally larger for sharp/shooting pain (22 participants) with the daily mean outcome. Compared with single-week recall-based assessments of pain qualities, the mean of daily assessments may improve RCT assay sensitivity when used to define entry criteria and assess outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This study suggests that means of daily pain quality assessments may improve assay sensitivity when used to define entry criteria and assess outcomes in clinical trials. This work may inform design of future clinical trials evaluating the intensity of different pain qualities.

摘要

神经性疼痛患者常表现出多样的疼痛及非疼痛性感觉特征,这些可作为随机临床试验(RCT)的结局指标。本研究旨在调查这些感觉特征严重程度在个体内的变异性,以及7天每日疼痛特征评估的均值是否比基于单周回忆的评估具有更好的分析灵敏度(即对治疗效果更敏感)。这项二次分析使用了一项经皮电神经刺激治疗化疗引起的周围神经病变的RCT(N = 142)数据。参与者在试验基线和终点(治疗6周后),使用0至10数字评分量表,每天(24小时回忆)和每周结束时(周回忆)对疼痛和非疼痛性感觉特征的严重程度进行1周的评分。对于疼痛特征分析灵敏度分析,这两种测量方法用于:1)定义研究样本(即有多少参与者达到最小基线疼痛特征严重程度);2)使用协方差分析计算观察到的效应量(即组间平均疼痛特征差异)。与周回忆相比,使用每日平均结局检测未来临床试验中热/灼痛和痉挛的观察到的效应量所需的预计样本量要小得多(即热/灼痛:153对388,痉挛:121对349),而对于锐痛/刺痛,使用每日平均结局时仅略大(22名参与者)。与基于单周回忆的疼痛特征评估相比,每日评估的均值在用于定义纳入标准和评估结局时可能会提高RCT分析灵敏度。观点:本研究表明,每日疼痛特征评估的均值在用于定义纳入标准和评估临床试验结局时可能会提高分析灵敏度。这项工作可能为未来评估不同疼痛特征强度的临床试验设计提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c59e/11486568/5ed796df93b3/nihms-2014113-f0001.jpg

相似文献

6
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for fibromyalgia in adults.成人纤维肌痛的经皮电神经刺激(TENS)疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 9;10(10):CD012172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012172.pub2.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验