Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Dec;33(12):2680-2686. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.049. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
Pneumatic tourniquets are frequently employed in extremity surgeries, aiming to enhance intraoperative visibility and minimize blood loss. Although their benefits and drawbacks have been extensively studied in lower limb operations, their impact on upper limb procedures, particularly elbow surgery, remains poorly understood. This study investigates the advantages and risks associated with pneumatic tourniquet used in elbow surgery.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 183 patients who underwent elbow surgery for fractures between January 2019 and September 2023. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who underwent surgery with a tourniquet (WT) and those without a tourniquet (NT). Subgroup analyses were performed based on fracture complexity. Data collected included patient characteristics, tourniquet usage, surgical duration, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin levels, C-reactive protein levels, pain assessments, opioid administration, hospital stay duration, follow-up, complications, and revisions. Statistical analyses were used to identify significant differences and correlations.
The use of a tourniquet in elbow surgery yielded several notable outcomes. Patients in the WT group experienced significantly shorter surgical durations and hospital stays. Hemoglobin drop was lower in the WT group, indicating reduced blood loss. However, there were no significant differences in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, or complications between the WT and NT groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that the recorded differences, particularly shorter surgical durations, were more pronounced in complex fractures.
This study shows promising results in the use of pneumatic tourniquets in elbow surgery in terms of enhanced efficiency, reduced blood loss, and overall safety, without compromising patient outcomes. However, the potential influence of perioperative decision-making on tourniquet usage underscores the need for further research to elucidate its role and optimize its application, especially in complex elbow fractures.
在四肢手术中,气动止血带经常被使用,目的是提高术中可视性和减少失血。虽然它们在下肢手术中的益处和缺点已经被广泛研究,但它们对上肢手术,特别是肘部手术的影响,仍知之甚少。本研究调查了在肘部手术中使用气动止血带的优点和风险。
回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 9 月期间接受肘部骨折手术的 183 名患者。患者分为两组:使用止血带的手术组(WT)和未使用止血带的手术组(NT)。根据骨折的复杂性进行亚组分析。收集的数据包括患者特征、止血带使用情况、手术时间、术前和术后血红蛋白水平、C 反应蛋白水平、疼痛评估、阿片类药物使用、住院时间、随访、并发症和翻修情况。使用统计分析来识别显著差异和相关性。
在肘部手术中使用止血带产生了一些显著的结果。WT 组患者的手术时间和住院时间明显缩短。WT 组血红蛋白下降较低,表明失血量减少。然而,WT 组和 NT 组之间在术后疼痛、阿片类药物使用或并发症方面没有显著差异。亚组分析显示,在复杂骨折中,记录的差异,特别是手术时间的缩短,更为明显。
本研究表明,在肘部手术中使用气动止血带具有提高效率、减少失血和整体安全性的有前景的结果,而不会影响患者的结果。然而,围手术期决策对止血带使用的潜在影响突出表明需要进一步研究,以阐明其作用并优化其应用,特别是在复杂的肘部骨折中。