Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Asan Diabetes Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Clin Ther. 2024 Sep;46(9):662-669. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.06.023. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety profile of pioglitazone compared with placebo (PBO) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin.
In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial, 366 patients with T2D who did not meet glycemic targets (7.0% ≤ glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA] ≤ 10.5%), despite treatment with metformin ≥1000 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg, received either a PBO, 15 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO15), or 30 mg of pioglitazone daily (PIO30). The primary end point was the mean change in HbA from baseline at 24 weeks across the groups.
For the 366 participants (PBO, n = 124; PIO15, n = 118; PIO30, n = 124), the mean age was 55.6 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.7 years, with a baseline HbA of 7.9%. After 24 weeks, HbA reduced significantly in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups from baseline, with intergroup differences of -0.38% and -0.83%, respectively, compared with the PBO group. The proportion of patients with HbA levels <7% was significantly higher in the PIO15 and PIO30 groups than in the PBO group. The adverse event rates did not significantly differ across the groups, indicating favorable safety profiles for triple combination therapy using metformin, dapagliflozin, and pioglitazone.
The addition of pioglitazone as a third oral antidiabetic medication is an appropriate option for patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin and dapagliflozin based on the resulting significant efficacy in glycemic control and favorable safety profile.
gov identifier: NCT04885712.
本研究旨在确定吡格列酮与安慰剂(PBO)相比在二甲双胍和达格列净治疗血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的疗效和安全性。
在这项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、PBO 对照试验中,366 名 T2D 患者尽管接受了二甲双胍≥1000mg 和达格列净 10mg 治疗,但血糖控制仍未达标(7.0%≤糖化血红蛋白[HbA]≤10.5%),他们分别接受 PBO、每日 15mg 吡格列酮(PIO15)或每日 30mg 吡格列酮(PIO30)治疗。主要终点是各组 24 周时基线 HbA 的平均变化。
对于 366 名参与者(PBO,n=124;PIO15,n=118;PIO30,n=124),平均年龄为 55.6 岁,糖尿病平均病程为 8.7 年,基线 HbA 为 7.9%。24 周后,PIO15 和 PIO30 组的 HbA 较基线显著降低,与 PBO 组相比,分别有 -0.38%和 -0.83%的组间差异。HbA 水平<7%的患者比例在 PIO15 和 PIO30 组明显高于 PBO 组。各组的不良反应发生率无显著差异,表明使用二甲双胍、达格列净和吡格列酮的三联组合治疗具有良好的安全性。
对于二甲双胍和达格列净治疗血糖控制不佳的 T2D 患者,加用吡格列酮作为第三种口服降糖药是一种合适的选择,因为其在血糖控制方面具有显著疗效,且安全性良好。
gov 标识符:NCT04885712。