• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 BEST-CLI 试验中,血运重建策略对临床失败、血流动力学失败和慢性肢体威胁性缺血症状的影响。

The impact of revascularization strategy on clinical failure, hemodynamic failure, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia symptoms in the BEST-CLI Trial.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1755-1765.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.085. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.085
PMID:39069016
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11734614/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is needed to resolve symptoms and prevent limb loss. We sought to compare rates of clinical and hemodynamic failure as well as resolution of initial and prevention of recurrent CLTI after endovascular (ENDO) vs bypass (OPEN) revascularization in the Best-Endovascular-versus-best-Surgical-Therapy-in-patients-with-CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial.

METHODS

As planned secondary analyses of the BEST-CLI trial, we examined the rates of (1) clinical failure (a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation, major reintervention, and degradation of WIfI stage); (2) hemodynamic failure (a composite of above-ankle amputation, major and minor reintervention to maintain index limb patency, failure to an initial increase or a subsequent decrease in ankle brachial index of 0.15 or toe brachial index of 0.10, and radiographic evidence of treatment stenosis or occlusion); (3) time to resolution of presenting CLTI symptoms; and (4) incidence of recurrent CLTI. Time-to-event analyses were performed by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1: suitable single segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], N = 1434; cohort 2: lacking suitable SSGSV, N = 396), and multivariate stratified Cox regression models were created.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, there was a significant difference in time to clinical failure (log-rank P < .001), hemodynamic failure (log-rank P < .001), and resolution of presenting symptoms (log-rank P = .009) in favor of OPEN. In cohort 2, there was a significantly lower rate of hemodynamic failure (log-rank P = .006) favoring OPEN, and no significant difference in time to clinical failure or resolution of presenting symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that assignment to OPEN was associated with a significantly lower risk of clinical and hemodynamic failure in both cohorts and a significantly higher likelihood of resolving initial and preventing recurrent CLTI symptoms in cohort 1, including after adjustment for key baseline patient covariates (end-stage renal disease [ESRD], prior revascularization, smoking, diabetes, age >80 years, WIfI stage, tissue loss, and infrapopliteal disease). Factors independently associated with clinical failure included age >80 years in cohort 1 and ESRD across both cohorts. ESRD was associated with hemodynamic failure in cohort 1. Factors associated with slower resolution of presenting symptoms included diabetes in cohort 1 and WIfI stage in cohort 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for CLTI is important to avoid persistent and recurrent CLTI, reinterventions, and limb loss. When compared with ENDO, initial treatment with OPEN surgical bypass, particularly with available saphenous vein, is associated with improved clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and enhanced resolution of CLTI symptoms.

摘要

目的

慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)血管重建后需要持续的临床和血流动力学获益,以解决症状并预防肢体丧失。我们旨在比较血管内(ENDO)与旁路(OPEN)血管重建后 CLTI 临床和血流动力学失败的发生率,以及初始和复发性 CLTI 的缓解率,以验证最佳血管内与最佳手术治疗 CLTI 患者(BEST-CLI)试验的结果。

方法

作为 BEST-CLI 试验的计划二次分析,我们检测了以下指标的发生率:(1)临床失败(全因死亡、踝上截肢、主要再介入和 WIfI 分级恶化的复合事件);(2)血流动力学失败(踝上截肢、主要和次要介入以维持指数肢体通畅、初始踝肱指数增加或后续下降 0.15 或趾肱指数下降 0.10、以及治疗狭窄或闭塞的影像学证据的复合事件);(3)出现 CLTI 症状的缓解时间;(4)复发性 CLTI 的发生率。在两个试验队列(队列 1:适合单段大隐静脉[SSGSV],N=1434;队列 2:缺乏适合 SSGSV,N=396)中,通过意向治疗分配进行了时间到事件分析,并创建了多变量分层 Cox 回归模型。

结果

在队列 1 中,OPEN 组在临床失败(对数秩 P<0.001)、血流动力学失败(对数秩 P<0.001)和出现症状缓解(对数秩 P=0.009)方面的时间上存在显著差异。在队列 2 中,OPEN 组的血流动力学失败率显著降低(对数秩 P=0.006),而临床失败或出现症状缓解的时间无显著差异。多变量分析显示,在两个队列中,OPEN 组的临床和血流动力学失败风险显著降低,并且在队列 1 中,初始缓解和预防复发性 CLTI 症状的可能性显著增加,包括对关键基线患者协变量(终末期肾病[ESRD]、先前的血管重建、吸烟、糖尿病、年龄>80 岁、WIfI 分级、组织损失和胫下疾病)进行调整后。与临床失败相关的因素包括队列 1 中的年龄>80 岁和两个队列中的 ESRD。ESRD 与队列 1 中的血流动力学失败相关。与出现症状缓解较慢相关的因素包括队列 1 中的糖尿病和队列 2 中的 WIfI 分级。

结论

CLTI 血管重建后的持久临床和血流动力学获益对于避免持续和复发性 CLTI、再介入和肢体丧失非常重要。与 ENDO 相比,初始使用 OPEN 旁路手术治疗,特别是有可用的隐静脉,与改善临床和血流动力学结局以及增强 CLTI 症状缓解相关。

相似文献

1
The impact of revascularization strategy on clinical failure, hemodynamic failure, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia symptoms in the BEST-CLI Trial.在 BEST-CLI 试验中,血运重建策略对临床失败、血流动力学失败和慢性肢体威胁性缺血症状的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1755-1765.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.085. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.旁路血管及早期技术失败对慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管重建的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Secondary interventions following open vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial.BEST-CLI试验中针对慢性肢体威胁性缺血进行开放与血管内血运重建后的二级干预措施。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1428-1437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
4
Surgery or endovascular therapy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia requiring infrapopliteal interventions.慢性肢体缺血高危患者的下肢动脉腔内治疗或手术治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1515-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.049. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Validation of BEST-CLI among patients undergoing primary bypass or angioplasty with or without stenting for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.在接受初次搭桥或血管成形术(无论是否置入支架)治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者中对BEST-CLI进行验证。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 May;81(5):1138-1147.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.009. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
6
Advanced Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection stage is associated with poor outcomes in the BEST-CLI trial.在BEST-CLI试验中,严重创伤、缺血和足部感染阶段与不良预后相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Mar;81(3):720-729.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.11.027. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
7
Female patients have fewer limb amputations compared to male patients in the BEST-CLI trial.在BEST-CLI试验中,女性患者的肢体截肢情况比男性患者少。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):366-373.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.031. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
8
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
9
Prosthetic conduits have worse outcomes compared with great saphenous vein conduits in femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal bypass in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.在患有慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者中,在股腘和腘以下旁路手术中,与大隐静脉导管相比,人工血管导管的治疗效果更差。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):408-416.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
10
Outcomes of chronic limb-threatening ischemia revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease in the BEST-CLI trial.BEST-CLI试验中慢性肾脏病患者慢性肢体威胁性缺血血运重建的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;81(4):945-956.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.128. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Bypass Conduit and Early Technical Failure on Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.旁路血管及早期技术失败对慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管重建的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014716. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Secondary interventions following open vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial.BEST-CLI试验中针对慢性肢体威胁性缺血进行开放与血管内血运重建后的二级干预措施。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1428-1437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Reprint of: Early peripheral vascular interventions for claudication are associated with higher rates of late interventions and progression to chronic limb threatening ischemia.早期外周血管介入治疗跛行与晚期介入治疗和进展为慢性肢体威胁性缺血的发生率较高相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jun;77(6):1720-1731.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.023.
3
A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial.对于需要进行 below-the-knee(小腿)、伴或不伴额外更近端 below-inguinal(腹股沟下)血运重建以恢复肢体灌注的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者,静脉旁路优先与最佳血管内治疗优先再血管化策略的比较(BASIL-2):一项开放标签、随机、多中心、3 期试验。
Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血的手术或血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Evaluation of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia undergoing endovascular intervention for femoropopliteal disease.评价全球肢体解剖分期系统在接受股腘动脉疾病血管内介入治疗的慢性肢体严重缺血患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Feb;77(2):474-479.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.188. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
6
Predictability of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) for Technical and Limb Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全球肢体解剖分期系统(GLASS)对技术和肢体相关结局的预测性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jul;64(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.044. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization.利伐沙班治疗血管重建术后外周动脉疾病
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1994-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000052. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
8
2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): Document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteriesEndorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO)The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)合作制定的外周动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南:涵盖颅外颈动脉和椎动脉、肠系膜、肾、上肢和下肢动脉粥样硬化疾病的文件 认可机构:欧洲卒中组织(ESO) 欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)外周动脉疾病诊断和治疗特别工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):763-816. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095.
9
Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial.严重肢体缺血患者最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗对比试验(BEST-CLI)的设计与原理
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 8;5(7):e003219. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003219.
10
Determinants of survival and major amputation after peripheral endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia.严重肢体缺血外周血管腔内介入治疗后生存及大截肢的决定因素
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Sep;62(3):655-64.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.391. Epub 2015 Jul 26.