Suppr超能文献

在 BEST-CLI 试验中,血运重建策略对临床失败、血流动力学失败和慢性肢体威胁性缺血症状的影响。

The impact of revascularization strategy on clinical failure, hemodynamic failure, and chronic limb-threatening ischemia symptoms in the BEST-CLI Trial.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1755-1765.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.085. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Sustained clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is needed to resolve symptoms and prevent limb loss. We sought to compare rates of clinical and hemodynamic failure as well as resolution of initial and prevention of recurrent CLTI after endovascular (ENDO) vs bypass (OPEN) revascularization in the Best-Endovascular-versus-best-Surgical-Therapy-in-patients-with-CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial.

METHODS

As planned secondary analyses of the BEST-CLI trial, we examined the rates of (1) clinical failure (a composite of all-cause death, above-ankle amputation, major reintervention, and degradation of WIfI stage); (2) hemodynamic failure (a composite of above-ankle amputation, major and minor reintervention to maintain index limb patency, failure to an initial increase or a subsequent decrease in ankle brachial index of 0.15 or toe brachial index of 0.10, and radiographic evidence of treatment stenosis or occlusion); (3) time to resolution of presenting CLTI symptoms; and (4) incidence of recurrent CLTI. Time-to-event analyses were performed by intention-to-treat assignment in both trial cohorts (cohort 1: suitable single segment great saphenous vein [SSGSV], N = 1434; cohort 2: lacking suitable SSGSV, N = 396), and multivariate stratified Cox regression models were created.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, there was a significant difference in time to clinical failure (log-rank P < .001), hemodynamic failure (log-rank P < .001), and resolution of presenting symptoms (log-rank P = .009) in favor of OPEN. In cohort 2, there was a significantly lower rate of hemodynamic failure (log-rank P = .006) favoring OPEN, and no significant difference in time to clinical failure or resolution of presenting symptoms. Multivariate analysis revealed that assignment to OPEN was associated with a significantly lower risk of clinical and hemodynamic failure in both cohorts and a significantly higher likelihood of resolving initial and preventing recurrent CLTI symptoms in cohort 1, including after adjustment for key baseline patient covariates (end-stage renal disease [ESRD], prior revascularization, smoking, diabetes, age >80 years, WIfI stage, tissue loss, and infrapopliteal disease). Factors independently associated with clinical failure included age >80 years in cohort 1 and ESRD across both cohorts. ESRD was associated with hemodynamic failure in cohort 1. Factors associated with slower resolution of presenting symptoms included diabetes in cohort 1 and WIfI stage in cohort 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable clinical and hemodynamic benefit after revascularization for CLTI is important to avoid persistent and recurrent CLTI, reinterventions, and limb loss. When compared with ENDO, initial treatment with OPEN surgical bypass, particularly with available saphenous vein, is associated with improved clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and enhanced resolution of CLTI symptoms.

摘要

目的

慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)血管重建后需要持续的临床和血流动力学获益,以解决症状并预防肢体丧失。我们旨在比较血管内(ENDO)与旁路(OPEN)血管重建后 CLTI 临床和血流动力学失败的发生率,以及初始和复发性 CLTI 的缓解率,以验证最佳血管内与最佳手术治疗 CLTI 患者(BEST-CLI)试验的结果。

方法

作为 BEST-CLI 试验的计划二次分析,我们检测了以下指标的发生率:(1)临床失败(全因死亡、踝上截肢、主要再介入和 WIfI 分级恶化的复合事件);(2)血流动力学失败(踝上截肢、主要和次要介入以维持指数肢体通畅、初始踝肱指数增加或后续下降 0.15 或趾肱指数下降 0.10、以及治疗狭窄或闭塞的影像学证据的复合事件);(3)出现 CLTI 症状的缓解时间;(4)复发性 CLTI 的发生率。在两个试验队列(队列 1:适合单段大隐静脉[SSGSV],N=1434;队列 2:缺乏适合 SSGSV,N=396)中,通过意向治疗分配进行了时间到事件分析,并创建了多变量分层 Cox 回归模型。

结果

在队列 1 中,OPEN 组在临床失败(对数秩 P<0.001)、血流动力学失败(对数秩 P<0.001)和出现症状缓解(对数秩 P=0.009)方面的时间上存在显著差异。在队列 2 中,OPEN 组的血流动力学失败率显著降低(对数秩 P=0.006),而临床失败或出现症状缓解的时间无显著差异。多变量分析显示,在两个队列中,OPEN 组的临床和血流动力学失败风险显著降低,并且在队列 1 中,初始缓解和预防复发性 CLTI 症状的可能性显著增加,包括对关键基线患者协变量(终末期肾病[ESRD]、先前的血管重建、吸烟、糖尿病、年龄>80 岁、WIfI 分级、组织损失和胫下疾病)进行调整后。与临床失败相关的因素包括队列 1 中的年龄>80 岁和两个队列中的 ESRD。ESRD 与队列 1 中的血流动力学失败相关。与出现症状缓解较慢相关的因素包括队列 1 中的糖尿病和队列 2 中的 WIfI 分级。

结论

CLTI 血管重建后的持久临床和血流动力学获益对于避免持续和复发性 CLTI、再介入和肢体丧失非常重要。与 ENDO 相比,初始使用 OPEN 旁路手术治疗,特别是有可用的隐静脉,与改善临床和血流动力学结局以及增强 CLTI 症状缓解相关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血的手术或血管内治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
7
Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease after Revascularization.利伐沙班治疗血管重建术后外周动脉疾病
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1994-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000052. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验