Hagiwara Koichi
Epilepsy and Sleep Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2024 Aug 27;64(8):540-549. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001930-2. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
Identification of insular lobe epilepsy (ILE) presents a major clinical challenge in the diagnosis and treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsies. ILE has diverse clinical presentations due to the multifaceted functions of the insula. Surface EEG findings do not provide straightforward information to predict this deeply-situated origin of seizures; they are even misleading, masquerading as those of other focal epilepsies, such as temporal and frontal ones. Non-invasive imagings may disclose insular abnormalities, but extra-insular abnormalities can coexist or even stand out. Careful reading and a second-look guided by other clinical information are crucial in order not to miss subtle insulo-opercular abnormalities. Furthermore, a possible insular origin of seizures should be considered in MRI-negative frontal/temporal/parietal epilepsies. Therefore, exploration/exclusion of insular-origin seizures is necessary for a great majority of surgical candidates. As for the stereo-electroencephalography, considered as the gold standard method for intra-cranial EEG investigations with suspicion of ILE, planning of electrode positions/trajectories require sufficient knowledge of the functional localization and anatomo-functional connectivity of the insula. Dense sampling within the insula is required in patients with probable ILE, because the seizure-onset zone can be restricted to a single insular gyrus or even a part of it. It is also crucial to explore extra-insular regions on the basis of non-invasive investigation results while considering their anatomo-functional relationships with the insula. From a surgical perspective, differentiating seizures strictly confined to the insula from those extending to the opercula is of particular importance. Pure insular seizures can be treated with less invasive measures, such as radiofrequency thermocoagulation. To conclude, close attention must be paid to the possibility of ILE throughout the diagnostic workup. The precise identification/exclusion of ILE is a prerequisite to provide appropriate and effective surgical treatment in pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies.
岛叶癫痫(ILE)的识别是耐药性局灶性癫痫诊断和治疗中的一项重大临床挑战。由于岛叶具有多方面的功能,ILE有多种临床表现。头皮脑电图结果无法直接提供信息来预测这种深部起源的癫痫发作;它们甚至具有误导性,会伪装成其他局灶性癫痫(如颞叶和额叶癫痫)的脑电图表现。非侵入性影像学检查可能会发现岛叶异常,但岛叶外的异常也可能同时存在甚至更为突出。仔细阅读并结合其他临床信息进行二次判断至关重要,以免遗漏细微的岛叶 - 岛盖部异常。此外,对于MRI阴性的额叶/颞叶/顶叶癫痫,应考虑癫痫发作可能起源于岛叶。因此,对于绝大多数手术候选患者而言,有必要探查/排除起源于岛叶的癫痫发作。至于立体定向脑电图,它被认为是怀疑ILE时进行颅内脑电图检查的金标准方法,电极位置/轨迹的规划需要对岛叶的功能定位以及解剖 - 功能连接有充分了解。对于可能患有ILE的患者,需要在岛叶内进行密集采样,因为癫痫发作起始区可能局限于单个岛叶回甚至其一部分。根据非侵入性检查结果探索岛叶外区域,并考虑它们与岛叶的解剖 - 功能关系也很关键。从手术角度来看,严格区分局限于岛叶的癫痫发作和扩展至岛盖部的癫痫发作尤为重要。单纯的岛叶癫痫可以采用侵入性较小的措施进行治疗,如射频热凝术。总之,在整个诊断过程中必须密切关注ILE的可能性。准确识别/排除ILE是在耐药性局灶性癫痫中提供恰当有效手术治疗的前提。