Department of Psychology, Carleton University.
Department of Psychology, Concordia University.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Aug;38(5):519-539. doi: 10.1037/adb0000909.
We examined alcohol use and consequences across five categories of same-day drinking intentions and willingness and tested whether same-day motives and protective strategies predicted differences in outcomes across categories of intentions and willingness.
In a 14-week ecological momentary assessment design, undergraduate student participants (N = 196) reported drinking intentions and behaviors over 13 surveys weekly (four morning surveys [Thursday through Sunday]; three midday, early, and late evening surveys [Thursday through Saturday]). On average, participants were 20.61 years old (SD = 1.50; range 17-25), 63% identified as female (n = 124), 29% as male (n = 57), and 8% identified as neither male nor female (n = 15; i.e., nonbinary; transgender; genderqueer; agender). Participants reported numbers of drinks consumed on the evening (past 2 hr) and morning (previous day) surveys. Multilevel generalized linear models tested effects of drinking intentions/willingness categories, motives, protective strategies, and interactions between key variables on alcohol use and consequences in several models.
Rates and quantities of drinking were highest on planned drinking days, and especially high when students planned to get drunk. When enhancement and social motives were elevated, students were more likely to drink and consumed more drinks even on unplanned drinking days, and especially when socializing with others. Effects of coping motives were weaker and sparse. Harm reduction protective strategies were associated with more positive and negative consequences with little variation across planned and unplanned drinking days.
Jointly considering drinking intentions and willingness narrows the intention-behavior gap in student drinking and suggests potential areas of focus for messaging around responsible drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
我们考察了五种同天饮酒意向和意愿类别中的饮酒行为和后果,并检验了同天动机和保护策略是否能预测意向和意愿类别中结果的差异。
在一项为期 14 周的生态瞬间评估设计中,本科学生参与者(N = 196)每周通过 13 次调查报告饮酒意向和行为(周四至周日进行 4 次晨间调查,周四至周六进行 3 次午间、早间和晚间调查)。参与者平均年龄为 20.61 岁(SD = 1.50;范围 17-25),63%为女性(n = 124),29%为男性(n = 57),8%为非男非女(n = 15;即非二进制;跨性别;性别酷儿;无性)。参与者报告了当晚(过去 2 小时)和次日早晨(前一天)调查中的饮酒量。多项水平的广义线性模型在多个模型中检验了饮酒意向/意愿类别、动机、保护策略以及关键变量之间的交互作用对饮酒和后果的影响。
计划饮酒日的饮酒率和饮酒量最高,当学生计划喝醉时尤其高。当增强和社交动机升高时,即使在非计划饮酒日,学生也更有可能饮酒且饮酒量更多,尤其是与他人社交时。应对动机的影响较弱且稀疏。减少伤害的保护策略与更多的积极和消极后果相关,但在计划和非计划饮酒日之间变化不大。
综合考虑饮酒意向和意愿可以缩小学生饮酒中的意向-行为差距,并为负责任饮酒的信息传递提供潜在的重点关注领域。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。