Upadhyay Piyush, Khanna Rajeev, Sood Vikrant, Lal Bikrant Bihari, Alam Seema
Departments of Pediatric Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India.
Hepatol Int. 2025 Feb;19(1):234-243. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10713-2. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
Differentiation of Non-cirrhotic Portal Fibrosis (NCPF) from chronic liver disease (CLD) in children and adolescents with portal hypertension (PHT) is challenging especially in cases where liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and hepatic venous pressure gradient are higher. This objective of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the splenic stiffness measurement (SSM)/LSM ratio in the diagnosis of NCPF.
From January 2019 to December 2023, consecutive children and adolescents of 6 months to 18 years of age with PHT (CLD and NCPF) were prospectively enrolled. Transient elastography (TE) for SSM and LSM, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), liver biopsy/trans-jugular liver biopsy, abdominal imaging, and laboratory evaluation were done. The relationship of TE parameters for diagnosis of NCPF and CLD was evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) statistics were applied using R Studio-4.2.2 statistical software.
One hundred and forty seven with CLD and 27 patients with NCPF were evaluated. Median age was 10.0 (IQR 2.4-14.0) years; 68.4% were males. The AUROC of SSM/LSM ratio was better (0.992, 95%CI 0.982-1.0001) than LSM (0.945, 95%CI0.913-0.977) and SSM (0.626, 95%CI0.258-0.489) for the diagnosis of NCPF. SSM/LSM ratio cut-off of 3.67 predicted NCPF with an excellent sensitivity (100%), specificity (95.9%), and diagnostic accuracy (95.91%). The AUROC of SSM/LSM ratio was excellent and outperformed other TE parameters in the subgroups, i.e., LSM between 10 and 20 kPa (0.982, 95%CI 0.947-1.000), without clinically significant varices (CSV) (1.000, 95%CI 1.000-1.000) and with CSV (0.993, 95%CI 0.983-1.000). Diagnostic performance of SSM/LSM Ratio was better than LSM for discriminating NCPF from CLD using McNemar test (p = 0.01).
The SSM/LSM ratio is an excellent tool in differentiating NCPF from CLD.
在患有门静脉高压(PHT)的儿童和青少年中,区分非肝硬化门静脉纤维化(NCPF)与慢性肝病(CLD)具有挑战性,尤其是在肝脏硬度测量(LSM)和肝静脉压力梯度较高的情况下。本研究的目的是评估脾硬度测量(SSM)/LSM比值在NCPF诊断中的诊断准确性。
从2019年1月至2023年12月,前瞻性纳入6个月至18岁患有PHT(CLD和NCPF)的连续儿童和青少年。进行了用于SSM和LSM的瞬时弹性成像(TE)、上消化道内镜检查(UGIE)、肝活检/经颈静脉肝活检、腹部成像和实验室评估。评估了TE参数与NCPF和CLD诊断的关系。使用R Studio - 4.2.2统计软件应用受试者操作特征(ROC)统计。
评估了147例CLD患者和27例NCPF患者。中位年龄为10.0(IQR 2.4 - 14.0)岁;68.4%为男性。SSM/LSM比值的曲线下面积(AUROC)在NCPF诊断中优于LSM(0.945,95%CI 0.913 - 0.977)和SSM(0.626,95%CI 0.258 - 0.489)。SSM/LSM比值截断值为3.67时预测NCPF具有出色的敏感性(100%)、特异性(95.9%)和诊断准确性(95.91%)。在亚组中,即LSM在10至20 kPa之间(0.982,95%CI 0.947 - 1.000)、无临床显著性静脉曲张(CSV)(1.000,95%CI 1.000 - 1.000)和有CSV(0.993,95%CI 0.983 - 1.000)的亚组中,SSM/LSM比值的AUROC极佳且优于其他TE参数。使用McNemar检验,SSM/LSM比值在区分NCPF与CLD方面的诊断性能优于LSM(p = 0.01)。
SSM/LSM比值是区分NCPF与CLD的出色工具。