Barrow Amanda, Cohen Cathren, Serpico Jaclyn, Goodman Melissa, Grossman Daniel, Raifman Sarah, Upadhyay Ushma
University of California Los Angeles Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):320-328. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12281. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
On January 30, 2024, over 300 researchers filed an amicus brief in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a United States (US) Supreme Court case that could have severely impacted access to mifepristone, one of the two drugs commonly used in medication abortion. The researchers summarize the legal challenges to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) original approval of mifepristone in 2000 and its 2016 and 2021 decisions modifying mifepristone's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program and label, the responses from the FDA and drug manufacturer to the challenges, and the potential implications of the Court's decision on access to mifepristone in the US. The researchers detail how the FDA relied on a robust scientific record analyzing tens of thousands of patient experiences that conclusively demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the changes to the mifepristone REMS Program and label and urge the Supreme Court to rely on the clear scientific record and preserve access to mifepristone without reimposing restrictions. What follows is a reprint of this brief.
2024年1月30日,300多名研究人员在美国最高法院的“美国食品药品监督管理局诉希波克拉底医学联盟案”(FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine)中提交了一份法庭之友意见书。该案件可能会严重影响米非司酮的获取,米非司酮是药物流产中常用的两种药物之一。研究人员总结了对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)2000年最初批准米非司酮及其2016年和2021年修改米非司酮风险评估与缓解策略(REMS)计划及标签的法律挑战,FDA和药品制造商对这些挑战的回应,以及法院裁决对美国米非司酮获取的潜在影响。研究人员详细说明了FDA如何依据一份强有力的科学记录,该记录分析了数万名患者的经历,确凿地证明了米非司酮REMS计划及标签变更的安全性和有效性,并敦促最高法院依据清晰的科学记录,在不重新施加限制的情况下保留米非司酮的获取途径。以下是这份意见书的重印件。