Suppr超能文献

[小儿扁桃体切除术/腺样体切除术麻醉中麻醉指数与脑电双频指数监测麻醉深度的一致性对比分析]

[Comparative analysis of the consistency of anesthesia depth between anesthesia index and Narcotrend index in monitoring pediatric tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy surgery].

作者信息

Li J Y, Yang Y F, Zeng Y

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital Affiliated to the Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 30;104(29):2734-2739. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20231212-01368.

Abstract

To analyze the consistency of the anesthesia index (AI) and Narcotrend index (NI) in monitoring the depth of anesthesia in pediatric tonsil/adenoidectomy. A total of 129 children who underwent elective tonsil/adenoidectomy at Xijing Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University from July 2022 to October 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Both AI monitoring by ConView monitor and NI monitoring by Narcotrend monitor were conducted for children after they were admitted to the operating room, while Propofol-remifentanil combined with total intravenous anesthesia was used during the operation and the anesthetic dose was adjusted to maintain the NI value at 40-60. In addition, the AI and NI values were recorded at following time points: quiet eyes closing (T), the beginning of induction (T), loss of consciousness (T), tracheal intubation (T), the beginning of surgery (T), during tonsil excision (T), adenoidectomy (T), the end of surgery (T), consciousness recovery (T) and tracheal extubation (T). Bland-Altman consistency analysis was used to evaluate the consistency of the results of the two types of anesthesia depth monitoring, AI value and NI value. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to analyze the predictive efficacy of AI and NI values for the state of consciousness of children. The intraoperative awareness was followed up at 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month after surgery. In 129 cases, there were 78 boys and 51 girls, with an average age of (7.2±3.2) years and an operation time of (72.8±14.0) min. No AI data were missing, but 13 NI data were missing, with a missing rate of 10.1% (13/129). At time points T-T, the AI values were 67.5±19.2 and the NI values were 67.2±19.2. Bland-Altman consistency analysis showed that the difference in value between AI and NI was 0.3 (95%:-0.1-0.6, =0.120), with an out-of-consistency range of 4.0% (51/1 290). Before anesthesia induction, AI and NI values were maintained at a high level; with the beginning of anesthesia induction and the disappearance of the children's consciousness, both AI and NI values gradually decreased; after discontinuing the infusion of anesthetics, the values of AI and NI gradually increased, and the change trend of AI and NI in each stage of the perioperative period was consistent, and there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point (all >0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off value for predicting the state of consciousness using AI was 72.5, with an AUC of 0.73 (95%: 0.70-0.75), and the cut-off value of NI was 79.5 and the AUC was 0.74 (95%: 0.72-0.77). There was no significant difference in AUC between the two indices (=0.310). None of the children had intraoperative awareness. Both AI and NI can be used to monitor the depth of anesthesia in pediatric tonsil/adenoidectomy with high accuracy.

摘要

分析麻醉指数(AI)与脑电双频指数(NI)在小儿扁桃体/腺样体切除术中监测麻醉深度的一致性。前瞻性纳入2022年7月至2023年10月在空军军医大学附属西京医院行择期扁桃体/腺样体切除术的129例患儿。患儿入手术室后,同时采用ConView监测仪进行AI监测及Narcotrend监测仪进行NI监测,术中采用丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉,调整麻醉剂量使NI值维持在40-60。此外,在安静闭眼(T₁)、诱导开始(T₂)、意识消失(T₃)、气管插管(T₄)、手术开始(T₅)、扁桃体切除时(T₆)、腺样体切除时(T₇)、手术结束(T₈)、意识恢复(T₉)及气管拔管(T₁₀)等时间点记录AI和NI值。采用Bland-Altman一致性分析评估两种麻醉深度监测结果(AI值与NI值)的一致性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)分析AI和NI值对患儿意识状态的预测效能。术后24小时、1周及1个月随访术中知晓情况。129例中,男78例,女51例,平均年龄(7.2±3.2)岁,手术时间(72.8±14.0)分钟。AI数据无缺失,NI数据缺失13例,缺失率为10.1%(13/129)。在T₁-T₁₀时间点,AI值为67.5±19.2,NI值为67.2±19.2。Bland-Altman一致性分析显示,AI与NI值差异为0.3(95%可信区间:-0.1-0.6,P=0.120),不一致范围为4.0%(51/1290)。麻醉诱导前,AI和NI值维持在较高水平;随着麻醉诱导开始及患儿意识消失,AI和NI值逐渐下降;停止输注麻醉药后,AI和NI值逐渐上升,围术期各阶段AI和NI的变化趋势一致,各时间点两组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,AI预测意识状态的截断值为72.5,AUC为0.73(95%可信区间:0.70-0.75),NI的截断值为79.5,AUC为0.74(95%可信区间:0.72-0.77)。两种指标的AUC差异无统计学意义(P=0.310)。所有患儿均未发生术中知晓。AI和NI均可用于小儿扁桃体/腺样体切除术中麻醉深度的高精度监测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验