Suppr超能文献

漏斗形腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的中期结果

Midterm Outcomes for Funnel-EVAR.

作者信息

Aytekin Bahadır, Mola Serkan, Deniz Gökay, Özçelik Sinan, İşcan Hakkı Zafer

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 20;25(6):224. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2506224. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The funnel technique, the hybrid assembly of a thoracic and abdominal aortic endograft, is advantageous for frail patients where efficient oversizing is not possible for infrarenal wide aortic necks over 34 mm. We sought to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the Funnel-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) technique using 60 mm length thoracic endograft.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 patients, all frail with high comorbidities, who were operated on with the Funnel technique using the 60 mm Lifetech Ankura thoracic endograft, in 7 urgent and 15 elective cases from January 2018. There were no exclusion criteria except having an age 60 years. Primary endpoints were the technical success and early mortality and morbidity; secondary endpoints were late outcomes such as endoleak, migration, late open surgical conversion, successful sac shrinkage, and enlargement at the infrarenal aortic neck diameter.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 72.6 7.3 years (62-86 years), with a mean aneurysm diameter of 83.2 16.8 mm and mean infrarenal aortic diameter of 38.7 2.4 mm. There was no early mortality. Technical success was 100%. 21 standard bifurcated and one aorto-uni-iliac abdominal endograft were deployed. The mean fluoroscopy time was 14.3 5.2 minutes. Mean follow-up was 32.8 19.6 months, with no endovascular complications. There was no Type-1a or Type-3 endoleak, migration, infrarenal aortic neck diameter enlargement, or aneurysm sac enlargement. During the follow-up, three patients died, but there was no aneurysm-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Funnel-EVAR is effective and safe for patients with a wide infrarenal aortic neck diameter when assessing midterm outcomes. Therefore, it should be part of the armamentarium of a vascular surgeon in patients with wide aortic necks 34 mm.

摘要

背景

漏斗技术,即胸主动脉和腹主动脉内移植物的混合组装,对于身体虚弱的患者具有优势,这些患者的肾下主动脉颈部直径超过34mm时无法进行有效的尺寸过大选择。我们试图确定使用60mm长的胸主动脉内移植物的漏斗式血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)技术的优缺点。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了22例患者,所有患者均身体虚弱且合并症多,于2018年1月采用60mm的微创神通安科拉胸主动脉内移植物,通过漏斗技术进行手术,其中7例为急诊手术,15例为择期手术。除年龄≥60岁外,无其他排除标准。主要终点是技术成功率、早期死亡率和发病率;次要终点是晚期结局,如内漏、移位、晚期开放手术转换、瘤囊成功缩小以及肾下主动脉颈部直径增大。

结果

患者的平均年龄为72.6±7.3岁(62 - 86岁),平均动脉瘤直径为83.2±16.8mm,平均肾下主动脉直径为38.7±2.4mm。无早期死亡。技术成功率为100%。共植入21个标准分叉型和1个主动脉单髂腹主动脉内移植物。平均透视时间为14.3±5.2分钟。平均随访时间为32.8±19.6个月,无血管内并发症。无1a型或3型内漏、移位、肾下主动脉颈部直径增大或动脉瘤囊增大。随访期间,3例患者死亡,但无动脉瘤相关死亡。

结论

在评估中期结局时,漏斗式EVAR对肾下主动脉颈部直径较宽的患者有效且安全。因此,对于主动脉颈部直径≥34mm的患者,它应成为血管外科医生的可用技术之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b739/11270054/58decd9c3fd5/2153-8174-25-6-224-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验