Song Ruirui, Liu Fang, Shi Xiaojing, Gao Hongmei, Chen Jun, Guo Xuefeng, Huang Jian
Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 250002 Jinan, Shandong, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 27;24(11):334. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411334. eCollection 2023 Nov.
This paper aimed to appraise the diagnostic precision of assorted methodologies to identify left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus through a network meta-assessment.
Methodologically, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases. Utilizing the risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Collaboration, methodological quality of included studies was critically assessed and potential publication bias was examined via funnel plots. The subsequent data analysis was executed using Stata software, with the most efficacious diagnostic modalities being determined based on cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
We scrutinized a sum of 18 papers, comprising 4102 subjects and utilizing 10 different diagnostic techniques. The hierarchical results derived from the network meta-analysis indicated that in regards to sensitivity, the dual-source cardiac computed tomography (DSCT) was superior (with a SUCRA value of 71.7%), it was succeeded by 3-minute delayed cardiac computed tomography (CCT) (scoring 66.8%), which surpassed the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (holding a SUCRA value of 57.5%). In terms of specificity, DSCT was the best (SUCRA value of 84.3%), followed by three dimensional (3D) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3D-CMRI) (SUCRA value of 78.0%), which was better than TEE (SUCRA value of 66.6%). In terms of positive likelihood ratio (PLR), 6-minute delayed CCT (SUCRA value of 85.6%) was superior to 3-minute delayed CCT (SUCRA value of 80.1%), both of which were superior to TEE (SUCRA value of 69.1%). DSCT (SUCRA value of 89.3%) had the best negative likelihood ratio (NLR), while DSCT (SUCRA value of 79.9%) had the highest accuracy.
This study demonstrated that DSCT outperformed TEE in sensitivity, specificity, NLR, and accuracy in identifying thrombus of LA/LAA among patients suffering from atrial fibrillation. Our conclusion is that DSCT is the best in diagnosing LA/LAA. In addition, 3D-CMRI and 3-minute delayed CCT are expected to replace TEE.
本文旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估各种方法识别左心房/左心耳(LA/LAA)血栓的诊断准确性。
在方法上,我们对多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索。利用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险工具,对纳入研究的方法学质量进行了严格评估,并通过漏斗图检查潜在的发表偏倚。随后使用Stata软件进行数据分析,根据累积排序曲线(SUCRA)值确定最有效的诊断方式。
我们共审查了18篇论文,涉及4102名受试者,并使用了10种不同的诊断技术。网络荟萃分析得出的分层结果表明,在敏感性方面,双源心脏计算机断层扫描(DSCT)表现最佳(SUCRA值为71.7%),其次是3分钟延迟心脏计算机断层扫描(CCT)(得分66.8%),其优于经食管超声心动图(TEE)(SUCRA值为57.5%)。在特异性方面,DSCT最佳(SUCRA值为84.3%),其次是三维(3D)心脏磁共振成像(3D-CMRI)(SUCRA值为78.0%),其优于TEE(SUCRA值为66.6%)。在阳性似然比(PLR)方面,6分钟延迟CCT(SUCRA值为85.6%)优于3分钟延迟CCT(SUCRA值为80.1%),两者均优于TEE(SUCRA值为69.1%)。DSCT(SUCRA值为89.3%)具有最佳的阴性似然比(NLR),而DSCT(SUCRA值为79.9%)具有最高的准确性。
本研究表明,在识别房颤患者LA/LAA血栓方面,DSCT在敏感性、特异性、NLR和准确性方面均优于TEE。我们的结论是DSCT在诊断LA/LAA方面是最佳的。此外,3D-CMRI和3分钟延迟CCT有望取代TEE。