• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种关于引文传播的记忆理论解释。

A memory-theoretic account of citation propagation.

作者信息

Dougherty Michael R, Illingworth David A, Nguyen Rosalind

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Psychology, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 29;11(5):231521. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231521. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.231521
PMID:39076797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11286183/
Abstract

Despite the common assumption that citations are indicative of an article's scientific merit, increasing evidence indicates that citation counts are largely driven by variables unrelated to quality. In this article, we treat people's decisions of what to cite as an instance of memory retrieval and show that observed citation patterns are well accounted for by a model of memory. The proposed exposure model anticipates that small alterations in factors that affect people's ability to retrieve to-be-cited articles from memory early in their life cycle are magnified over time and can lead to the emergence of highly cited papers. This effect occurs even when there is no variation in the starting point exposure probabilities (i.e. when assuming a level playing field where all articles are treated equally and of equal 'quality'), and is exacerbated by natural variation in retrievability of articles due to encoding. We discuss the implications of the model within the context of research evaluation and hiring, tenure and promotion decisions.

摘要

尽管人们普遍认为引用能够表明一篇文章的科学价值,但越来越多的证据表明,引用次数在很大程度上是由与质量无关的变量驱动的。在本文中,我们将人们关于引用内容的决策视为记忆检索的一个实例,并表明观察到的引用模式可以通过一个记忆模型得到很好的解释。所提出的曝光模型预测,在影响人们在文章生命周期早期从记忆中检索待引用文章能力的因素上的微小变化会随着时间的推移而放大,并可能导致高被引论文的出现。即使在起始点曝光概率没有变化的情况下(即假设所有文章都被平等对待且具有同等“质量”的公平竞争环境),这种效应也会发生,并且由于编码导致的文章可检索性的自然变化而加剧。我们在研究评估以及招聘、终身教职和晋升决策的背景下讨论该模型的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/c512512e3bea/rsos.231521.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/db60f41e9604/rsos.231521.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/075ac638774e/rsos.231521.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/86ee097a40a7/rsos.231521.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/e3855e23828f/rsos.231521.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/c512512e3bea/rsos.231521.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/db60f41e9604/rsos.231521.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/075ac638774e/rsos.231521.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/86ee097a40a7/rsos.231521.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/e3855e23828f/rsos.231521.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ac/11286183/c512512e3bea/rsos.231521.f005.jpg

相似文献

1
A memory-theoretic account of citation propagation.一种关于引文传播的记忆理论解释。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 May 29;11(5):231521. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231521. eCollection 2024 May.
2
The Citation Cloud of a biomedical article: a free, public, web-based tool enabling citation analysis.生物医学文章的引文云:一个免费的、公共的、基于网络的工具,实现引文分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):103-108. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1117.
3
What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality.在成瘾领域,被引频次有何作用?对被引频次及其与同行质量评级之间的联系进行实证评估。
Addiction. 2002 May;97(5):501-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00104.x.
4
[The characteristics and citation analysis of the publications in during 2016].[2016年期间某刊物出版物的特征及引文分析] (这里原文中“during 2016”前面应该有具体刊物名称,翻译时按实际情况补充完整)
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 29;100(48):3903-3910. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201117-03122.
5
[The citation analysis of the publications in Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine from 2014 to 2017].《2014年至2017年《中华预防医学杂志》发表论文的引文分析》
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 6;54(8):867-874. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200614-00876.
6
Can the highly cited psychiatric paper be predicted early?能否早期预测被高度引用的精神病学论文?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;43(2):173-6. doi: 10.1080/00048670802607246.
7
The 100 most cited papers in foot and ankle surgery.足踝外科领域被引用次数最多的100篇论文。
Foot (Edinb). 2014 Mar;24(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
Highly cited works in skull base neurosurgery.颅底神经外科领域的高被引著作。
World Neurosurg. 2015 Apr;83(4):403-18. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
9
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
10
How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?频繁引用文献在生物医学文献中的引用准确性如何?
Clin Sci (Lond). 2021 Mar 12;135(5):671-681. doi: 10.1042/CS20201573.

本文引用的文献

1
Gendered citation patterns among the scientific elite.科学界精英中的性别引文模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 4;119(40):e2206070119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206070119. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.被引频次和期刊影响因子并不能体现行为科学和脑科学领域某些研究质量指标。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 17;9(8):220334. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220334. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Bayesian rank-based hypothesis testing for the rank sum test, the signed rank test, and Spearman's .
用于秩和检验、符号秩检验和斯皮尔曼检验的基于贝叶斯秩的假设检验。
J Appl Stat. 2020 Jan 11;47(16):2984-3006. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053. eCollection 2020.
4
Intersectional inequalities in science.科学中的交叉不平等现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 11;119(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113067119.
5
Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.高影响力期刊文章中的引文存在性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
6
N-Best Evaluation for Academic Hiring and Promotion.学术招聘和晋升的 N 最佳评估。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;23(12):983-985. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Measuring Distribution Similarities Between Samples: A Distribution-Free Overlapping Index.测量样本间的分布相似性:一种无分布重叠指数。
Front Psychol. 2019 May 21;10:1089. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01089. eCollection 2019.
8
Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.使研究评估更加透明:使研究理念、机构价值观和报告保持一致。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):361-375. doi: 10.1177/1745691618810693. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
9
The Dark Side of Information Proliferation.信息爆炸的阴暗面。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 May;14(3):323-330. doi: 10.1177/1745691618803647. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
10
Order matters: Alphabetizing in-text citations biases citation rates.顺序很重要:文本内引文的字母排序会影响引文率。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):1020-1026. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1532-8.