Feng Jiayu, Zhao Xuemei, Huang Boping, Wu Yihang, Wang Jing, Guan Jingyuan, Huang Liyan, Li Xinqing, Zhang Yuhui, Zhang Jian
State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 10000 Beijing, China.
Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, National Health Committee, 10000 Beijing, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 25;24(12):362. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2412362. eCollection 2023 Dec.
The prognostic significance of QRS duration (QRSd) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 30% and 50% is unclear, resulting in questions regarding eligibility for cardiac resynchronisation therapy. This study aimed to explore the prognostic role of QRSd in patients with DCM and a LVEF 30-50% or LVEF 30.
Patients hospitalised at Fuwai hospital with DCM who had a LVEF 50% were prospectively included. The primary outcomes were a composite of death, heart transplantation, and rehospitalisation for worsening heart failure.
Among the 633 patients included, 302 (47.7%) had a LVEF of 30-50%. The multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for QRSd 120 ms was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.11, 0.001) for overall DCM patients, 2.8 (95% CI 1.82-4.30, 0.001) for patients with LVEF 30-50%, and 1.41 (95% CI 1.02-1.94, = 0.036) for patients with LVEF 30%. QRSd 120 ms tended to be more strongly associated with outcome in patients with LVEF 30-50% than in those with LVEF 30% despite the non-significant interaction ( = 0.067). DCM patients with QRSd 120 ms and LVEF 30-50% did not experience a significantly better outcome than those with LVEF 30% and QRSd 120 ms after propensity-score matching (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.36, = 0.645).
QRSd independently predicts prognosis in DCM patients irrespective of LVEF and identifies a group of high-risk patients who may benefit from device implantation despite the absence of severely reduced LVEF.
对于扩张型心肌病(DCM)且左心室射血分数(LVEF)在30%至50%之间的患者,QRS波时限(QRSd)的预后意义尚不清楚,这引发了关于心脏再同步治疗适用性的问题。本研究旨在探讨QRSd在LVEF为30 - 50%或LVEF<30%的DCM患者中的预后作用。
前瞻性纳入在阜外医院住院的LVEF<50%的DCM患者。主要结局为死亡、心脏移植以及因心力衰竭恶化再次住院的复合结局。
在纳入的633例患者中,302例(47.7%)的LVEF为30 - 50%。对于总体DCM患者,QRSd≥120 ms的多变量风险比(HR)为1.65(95%置信区间[CI] 1.29 - 2.11,P<0.001);对于LVEF为30 - 50%的患者,HR为2.8(95% CI 1.82 - 4.30,P<0.001);对于LVEF<30%的患者,HR为1.41(95% CI 1.02 - 1.94,P = 0.036)。尽管交互作用无统计学意义(P = 0.067),但QRSd≥120 ms在LVEF为30 - 50%的患者中与结局的关联往往比在LVEF<30%的患者中更强。倾向评分匹配后,QRSd≥120 ms且LVEF为30 - 50%的DCM患者的结局并不比LVEF<30%且QRSd≥120 ms的患者显著更好(HR 0.91,95% CI 0.61 - 1.36,P = 0.645)。
QRSd可独立预测DCM患者的预后,无论LVEF如何,并且可识别出一组高危患者,这些患者尽管LVEF未严重降低,但可能从器械植入中获益。