Pavasini Rita, Sanguettoli Federico, Zanarelli Luca, Deserio Maria Angela, Bianchi Nicola, Fabbri Gioele, Tebaldi Matteo, Biscaglia Simone, Campo Gianluca
UO Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 14;23(10):344. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310344. eCollection 2022 Oct.
In cardiology, the global phenomenon of population ageing poses new major challenges, ranging from more comorbid and frail patients to the presence of complex, calcified and multiple coronary lesions. Considering that elderly patients are under-represented in randomized clinical trials (RCT), the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current knowledge on the revascularization of the elderly patient with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease.
A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines has been performed. The search was conducted on Pubmed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected the articles focusing on patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction (MI) with multivessel disease and aged 75 years or older. A total of 36 studies have been included.
Multivessel coronary artery disease is present in around 50-60% of older patients with MI. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients older than 75 years is double compared to their younger counterpart, and the most prevalent complications after revascularization are bleeding and renal failure. In the treatment of patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention should be the first choice over fibrinolysis. However, it is not clear whether this population would benefit from complete revascularization or not. In patients with non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), an invasive approach with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft may be chosen, but a conservative strategy is also accepted. There are no data from large trials about the comparison of possible revascularization strategies in NSTEMI patients.
This systematic review shows that this field of research lacks randomized clinical trials to guide revascularization strategy in older STEMI or NSTEMI patients with MI. New results are expected from ongoing trials.
在心脏病学领域,全球人口老龄化现象带来了新的重大挑战,从合并症更多、身体更虚弱的患者,到复杂、钙化和多发冠状动脉病变的出现。鉴于老年患者在随机临床试验(RCT)中的代表性不足,本系统评价的目的是总结目前关于老年心肌梗死和多支冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建的知识。
按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。于2022年1月至2月在PubMed(Medline)、Cochrane图书馆、谷歌学术和生物医学中心数据库进行了检索。我们选择了关注因多支血管疾病住院的75岁及以上心肌梗死(MI)患者的文章。共纳入36项研究。
约50%-60%的老年MI患者存在多支冠状动脉疾病。75岁以上患者的院内死亡率是年轻患者的两倍,血运重建后最常见的并发症是出血和肾衰竭。在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的治疗中,直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗应优先于溶栓治疗。然而,尚不清楚该人群是否会从完全血运重建中获益。在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者中,可以选择经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的侵入性方法,但保守策略也被接受。没有来自大型试验的关于比较NSTEMI患者可能的血运重建策略的数据。
本系统评价表明,该研究领域缺乏随机临床试验来指导老年STEMI或NSTEMI合并MI患者的血运重建策略。期待正在进行的试验能得出新的结果。