• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从一种正在展开的紧急治疗到治疗方法的全面转变:基于导管的主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的历史与演变

From an Unfolding Emergency Treatment to a Universal Shift in Therapy: The History and Evolution of the Catheter-Based Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis.

作者信息

Agma Hüseyin Umut, Krull Alexandros, Feickert Sebastian, Ammareen Raid Al, Ince Hüseyin, D'Ancona Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine and Conservative Intensive Care Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, 10967 Berlin, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Internal Medicine and Conservative Intensive Care Medicine, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, 12351 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 17;23(10):349. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310349. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2310349
PMID:39077143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11267334/
Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is the most frequent valvular heart disease in industrialized countries, presenting with very high mortality if left untreated. While drug treatment can sometimes alleviate symptoms, it fails to stop progression or cure the underlying disease. Until the first decade of this millennium, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) remained the only available therapy option with a positive impact on mortality and morbidity. Even though several studies reported highly positive effects of SAVR regarding the improved quality of life and better physical performance, SAVR remained an intervention that, due to its remarkable complexity and the need for heart-lung machine and cardioplegia, was limited by the patients' comorbid profile. While unsatisfying hemodynamic results after transcatheter aortic balloon valvuloplasty in high-risk surgical patients limited its adoption as an alternative treatment, it provided the impetus for further interventional approaches to the therapy of AVS. This review considers the invention and development of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), which established itself as a catheter-based, minimally invasive procedure over the past decade, and has become an equivalent treatment method for high-risk surgical patients. For that matter, early TAVI concepts, their amendments, and the associated pioneers are recognized for paving the way to a revolutionary diversification in AVS treatment.

摘要

在工业化国家,主动脉瓣狭窄(AVS)是最常见的心脏瓣膜疾病,若不治疗,死亡率极高。虽然药物治疗有时可缓解症状,但无法阻止病情进展或治愈潜在疾病。在本世纪的第一个十年之前,外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)一直是唯一对死亡率和发病率有积极影响的治疗选择。尽管多项研究报告了SAVR在改善生活质量和提高身体机能方面具有高度积极的效果,但由于其显著的复杂性以及对心肺机和心脏停搏液的需求,SAVR仍然是一种受患者合并症情况限制的干预措施。虽然经导管主动脉球囊瓣膜成形术在高危手术患者中产生的血流动力学结果不尽人意,限制了其作为替代治疗方法的应用,但它为进一步采用介入方法治疗AVS提供了动力。本综述探讨了经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的发明与发展,在过去十年中,TAVI已确立为一种基于导管的微创手术,并已成为高危手术患者的等效治疗方法。就此而言,早期的TAVI概念、其改进以及相关的先驱者为AVS治疗带来革命性的多样化铺平了道路而受到认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/ff50a80ec5d7/2153-8174-23-10-349-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/e5595ae10410/2153-8174-23-10-349-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/04411e2eea48/2153-8174-23-10-349-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/ff50a80ec5d7/2153-8174-23-10-349-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/e5595ae10410/2153-8174-23-10-349-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/04411e2eea48/2153-8174-23-10-349-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/927c/11267334/ff50a80ec5d7/2153-8174-23-10-349-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
From an Unfolding Emergency Treatment to a Universal Shift in Therapy: The History and Evolution of the Catheter-Based Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis.从一种正在展开的紧急治疗到治疗方法的全面转变:基于导管的主动脉瓣狭窄治疗的历史与演变
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 17;23(10):349. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310349. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Nov 1;16(19):1-94. eCollection 2016.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术
Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4556.
5
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
6
7
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.中度手术风险的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(2):1-121. eCollection 2020.
9
History, development and clinical perspectives of sutureless and rapid deployment surgical aortic valve replacement.无缝合及快速植入式外科主动脉瓣置换术的历史、发展及临床展望
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep;9(5):375-385. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-18.
10
Beyond adding years to life: health-related quality-of-life and functional outcomes in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.超越延长生命年限:经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗手术风险高的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的健康相关生活质量和功能结局
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2013 Nov;9(4):281-94. doi: 10.2174/1573403x09666131202121750.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in stenotic bicuspid aortic valve compared to tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术在狭窄性二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣中应用的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Jul;20(7):581-588. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2094368. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid valve morphology: a roadmap towards standardization.二叶式瓣膜形态患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:迈向标准化的路线图。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Jan;20(1):52-67. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00734-5. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
3
How Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Was Born: The Struggle for a New Invention.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是如何诞生的:一项新发明的奋斗历程。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 29;8:722693. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.722693. eCollection 2021.
4
Surgical pericardial heart valves: 50 Years of evolution.外科心脏生物瓣膜:50 年的发展历程。
Int J Surg. 2021 Oct;94:106121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106121. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve Durability Among Different Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis.不同经导管主动脉瓣和外科主动脉瓣生物假体瓣膜耐久性的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;158:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.046. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
6
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
7
Eight-year outcomes for patients with aortic valve stenosis at low surgical risk randomized to transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement.低手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术随机分组的 8 年结果。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Aug 7;42(30):2912-2919. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab375.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):1043-1061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048048. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 2 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1149-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.052.
10
In Situ Heart Valve Tissue Engineering: Is Scaffold Structural Biomimicry Overrated?原位心脏瓣膜组织工程:支架结构仿生是否被高估了?
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 28;5(12):1207-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.11.009. eCollection 2020 Dec.