Suppr超能文献

短期双联抗血小板治疗与长期双联抗血小板治疗对PCI患者预后的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Comparison of Short-Term DAPT and Long-Term DAPT on the Prognosis of PCI Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Yang Jiaxin, Ding Yaodong, Wang Rui, Wang Kexin, Liu Xiaoli, Shen Hua, Sun Yan, Ge Hailong, Fang Zhe

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, 330006 Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 26;23(10):326. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310326. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the primary medication for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the best DAPT duration is still controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT compared to long-term (12 months) DAPT.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science systematically for all the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the different strategies for DAPT in patients undergoing PCI within ten years prior to January 2021. Major bleeding and any bleeding were identified as the safe endpoints. All causes of death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and stroke were identified as the efficacy endpoints. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) in each study were abstracted.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 trials and 24,242 patients were included in this meta-analysis with 15-month median follow-up time. Short-term DAPT was related to reduced risks of major bleeding (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89) and any bleeding (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.79). No obvious differences in any of the other endpoints were observed. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with drug-eluting stents (DES), short-term compared with long-term DAPT was related to a decreased risk of major bleeding (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87) without significant increasing in the risks of any bleeding and ischemic endpoints. Furthermore, short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy appreciably lowered the risk of major bleeding (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96) and any bleeding (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93). There were no obvious differences concerning death between the different strategies for DAPT.

CONCLUSIONS

After PCI with DES, short-term DAPT is safer than long-term DAPT, and is not inferior in effectiveness, even in ACS patients. P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy following short-term DAPT is also related to a decreased risk of bleeding and may be an alternative anti-platelet strategy.

摘要

背景

双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术后患者的主要药物治疗方法。然而,最佳的DAPT疗程仍存在争议。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估短期(3 - 6个月)DAPT与长期(12个月)DAPT相比的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science,查找2021年1月前十年内比较PCI患者不同DAPT策略的所有随机对照试验(RCT)。主要出血和任何出血被确定为安全性终点。全因死亡、心源性死亡、心肌梗死、明确/可能的支架血栓形成、靶血管血运重建和中风被确定为有效性终点。提取每项研究中的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

总体而言,本荟萃分析纳入了11项试验和24242例患者,中位随访时间为15个月。短期DAPT与主要出血风险降低(HR 0.65,95% CI 0.48 - 0.89)和任何出血风险降低(HR 0.64,95% CI 0.53 - 0.79)相关。在其他任何终点方面均未观察到明显差异。在接受药物洗脱支架(DES)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,与长期DAPT相比,短期DAPT与主要出血风险降低(HR 0.57,95% CI 0.37 - 0.87)相关,且任何出血和缺血性终点风险均未显著增加。此外,短期DAPT后使用P2Y12受体抑制剂单药治疗可显著降低主要出血风险(HR 0.64,95% CI 0.42 - 0.96)和任何出血风险(HR 0.58,95% CI 0.36 - 0.93)。不同DAPT策略在死亡方面无明显差异。

结论

在使用DES进行PCI术后,短期DAPT比长期DAPT更安全,即使在ACS患者中,其有效性也不逊色。短期DAPT后使用P2Y12受体抑制剂单药治疗也与出血风险降低相关,可能是一种替代的抗血小板策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2934/11267325/289e6f4adcbd/2153-8174-23-10-326-g1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验