Song Qingchun, Tan Haoyu, Yang Benli, Liu Hongduan, Fan Chengming
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410008 Changsha, Hunan, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 20;25(2):71. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2502071. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Cryoablation has emerged as a recognized interventional strategy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Numerous trials have investigated cryoablation as a first-line therapy for AF. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of cryoablation on quality of life (QoL) and safety outcomes compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with symptomatic AF.
A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cryoablation and AADs as first-line treatments for AF until May 2023. Continuous outcome data were analyzed using mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and dichotomous outcome data were analyzed using relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The primary outcomes assessed were QoL and serious adverse events.
Our analysis included four RCTs involving 928 patients. Cryoablation was associated with a significant improvement in the AF Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) score (3 trials; MD 7.46, 95% CI 2.50 to 12.42; = 0.003; = 79%) and EQ-VAS score (2 trials; MD 1.49, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.86; 0.001; = 0%) compared to AAD therapy. Additionally, cryoablation demonstrated a modest increase in EQ-5D score from baseline compared to AAD therapy, with no statistically significance (2 trials; MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07; = 0.07; = 79%). Furthermore, the rate of serious adverse events was significantly lower with cryoablation compared to AAD therapy (4 trials; 11.8% vs. 16.3%; RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-1.00; = 0.05; = 0%). Cryoablation was also associated with a reduction in overall adverse events, incidence of persistent AF, hospitalizations, and additional ablation. However, there was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events and emergency department visits between the two treatment groups.
Cryoablation, as a first-line treatment for symptomatic AF patients, significantly improved AF-specific quality of life and reduced serious adverse events, as well as overall adverse events, persistent AF, hospitalizations, and additional ablation compared to AADs.
冷冻消融已成为一种公认的治疗心房颤动(AF)的介入策略。众多试验已将冷冻消融作为AF的一线治疗方法进行研究。本荟萃分析旨在评估与抗心律失常药物(AADs)相比,冷冻消融对症状性AF患者生活质量(QoL)和安全性结局的影响。
对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行全面检索,以查找比较冷冻消融和AADs作为AF一线治疗方法的随机对照试验(RCTs),检索截至2023年5月。连续结局数据使用平均差(MDs)及95%置信区间(CIs)进行分析,二分结局数据使用相对风险(RRs)及95% CIs进行分析。评估的主要结局为QoL和严重不良事件。
我们的分析纳入了4项涉及928例患者的RCTs。与AAD治疗相比,冷冻消融与心房颤动对生活质量的影响(AFEQT)评分显著改善相关(3项试验;MD 7.46,95% CI 2.50至12.42;P = 0.003;I² = 79%)以及EQ-VAS评分改善相关(2项试验;MD 1.49,95% CI 1.13至1.86;P < 0.001;I² = 0%)。此外,与AAD治疗相比,冷冻消融显示EQ-5D评分较基线有适度增加,但无统计学意义(2项试验;MD 0.03,95% CI -0.01至0.07;P = 0.07;I² = 79%)。此外,与AAD治疗相比,冷冻消融的严重不良事件发生率显著更低(4项试验;11.8%对16.3%;RR,0.73;95% CI,0.54 - 1.00;P = 0.05;I² = 0%)。冷冻消融还与总体不良事件、持续性AF发生率、住院次数及再次消融的减少相关。然而,两组治疗在主要不良心血管事件和急诊科就诊方面无显著差异。
作为症状性AF患者的一线治疗方法,与AADs相比,冷冻消融显著改善了AF特异性生活质量,降低了严重不良事件以及总体不良事件、持续性AF、住院次数和再次消融的发生率。