Suppr超能文献

估算在患者生命的最后 30 天内开具系统癌症治疗药物的肿瘤医生的变异性。

Estimating oncologist variability in prescribing systemic cancer therapies to patients in the last 30 days of life.

机构信息

Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2024 Nov 1;130(21):3757-3767. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35488. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical guidelines and quality improvement initiatives have identified reducing the use of end-of-life cancer therapies as an opportunity to improve care. We examined the extent to which oncologists differed in prescribing systemic therapies in the last 30 days of life.

METHODS

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, we identified patients who died of cancer from 2012 to 2017 (N = 17,609), their treating oncologists (N = 960), and the corresponding physician practice (N = 388). We used multilevel models to estimate oncologists' rates of providing cancer therapy for patients in their last 30 days of life, adjusted for patient characteristics and practice variation.

RESULTS

Patients' median age at the time of death was 74 years (interquartile range, 69-79); patients had lung (62%), colorectal (17%), breast (13%), and prostate (8%) cancers. We observed substantial variation across oncologists in their adjusted rate of treating patients in the last 30 days of life: oncologists in the 95th percentile exhibited a 45% adjusted rate of treatment, versus 17% among the 5th percentile. A patient treated by an oncologist with a high end-of-life prescribing behavior (top quartile), compared to an oncologist with a low prescribing behavior (bottom quartile), had more than four times greater odds of receiving end-of-life cancer therapy (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 4.00-4.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists show substantial variation in end-of-life prescribing behavior. Future research should examine why some oncologists more often continue systemic therapy at the end of life than others, the consequences of this for patient and care outcomes, and whether interventions shaping oncologist decision-making can reduce overuse of end-of-life cancer therapies.

摘要

简介

临床指南和质量改进措施已经确定,减少临终癌症治疗的使用是改善护理的机会。我们研究了肿瘤学家在生命的最后 30 天内开具系统治疗药物的程度。

方法

使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据,我们确定了 2012 年至 2017 年死于癌症的患者(N=17609)、他们的治疗肿瘤学家(N=960)和相应的医生实践(N=388)。我们使用多水平模型来估计肿瘤学家在患者生命的最后 30 天内提供癌症治疗的比率,调整了患者特征和实践差异。

结果

患者死亡时的中位年龄为 74 岁(四分位距,69-79);患者患有肺癌(62%)、结直肠癌(17%)、乳腺癌(13%)和前列腺癌(8%)。我们观察到肿瘤学家在调整后的最后 30 天内治疗患者的比率方面存在很大差异:第 95 百分位的肿瘤学家表现出 45%的调整后治疗率,而第 5 百分位的肿瘤学家则为 17%。与低处方行为(第 4 分位)的肿瘤学家相比,接受高临终处方行为(第 1 分位)的肿瘤学家治疗的患者接受临终癌症治疗的可能性要高出四倍以上(OR,4.42;95%CI,4.00-4.89)。

结论

肿瘤学家在临终处方行为方面存在很大差异。未来的研究应该研究为什么一些肿瘤学家比其他肿瘤学家更经常在生命的最后阶段继续进行系统治疗,这对患者和护理结果的影响,以及是否可以通过干预措施来影响肿瘤学家的决策,从而减少临终癌症治疗的过度使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验