Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine.
Department of Life Science.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;40(6):603-609. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002745. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
The osteologic anatomy of the orbit is still a field of intense research, particularly as far as vascular channels are concerned. Among them, ethmoidal foraminas (EFs) are certainly those that have more clinical importance and indeed have been deeply investigated. Unfortunately, the vast production of articles, far from clarifying their anatomy, generated a certain degree of confusion.
A search on Pubmed and Scopus databases updated up to December 31, 2023, has been carried out with the keyword "ethmoidal foramen" yielding a list of 357 items. With a careful screening process, 31 articles were enlisted to be included in the present review.
A critical review process confirmed that many results published over the years appear inconsistent, particularly as far as EFs topography is concerned. The possible reasons for this lack of consistency can be traced back to inter-ethnical differences, uncertainty on the anterior bony landmarks employed in the investigations, and lack of a general consensus over EFs classification. A novel approach, based on the normalization of the distance of the anterior landmarks relative to the length of the orbit (relative depth index), should overcome some of the major problems encountered so far.
Novel and clear guidelines to classify EFs and to locate them on the medial wall are required. Determining the relative depth index of EFs may be an interesting approach to solve the matter. Other methods can be also devised. However, direct measurements from bony landmarks, without any further analysis seem inadequate and possibly misleading.
眼眶的骨解剖学仍然是一个研究热点,特别是在血管通道方面。其中,筛骨孔(EFs)无疑是具有更重要临床意义的,并且已经进行了深入研究。不幸的是,大量的文章不仅没有阐明其解剖结构,反而造成了一定程度的混淆。
在 Pubmed 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日的检索,使用关键词“筛骨孔”生成了 357 项的列表。通过仔细的筛选过程,有 31 篇文章被列入本次综述。
一个严格的审查过程证实,多年来发表的许多结果似乎不一致,特别是在 EFs 地形方面。这种不一致的可能原因可以追溯到种族间的差异、在研究中使用的前骨性标志的不确定性,以及对 EFs 分类缺乏共识。一种新的方法,基于前标志与眼眶长度的距离的标准化(相对深度指数),应该可以克服迄今为止遇到的一些主要问题。
需要新的、明确的 EFs 分类和在内侧壁定位 EFs 的指南。确定 EFs 的相对深度指数可能是解决这个问题的一个有趣方法。还可以设计其他方法。然而,直接从骨性标志进行测量,而不进行任何进一步的分析似乎是不够的,并且可能具有误导性。