• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待还是通过识别车辆的社会行为来促进交叉口的合作?

Wait or Pass? Promoting intersection's cooperation via identifying vehicle's social behavior.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Department of Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107724. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107724. Epub 2024 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107724
PMID:39079441
Abstract

Lack of communication between road users can reduce traffic efficiency and cause safety issues like traffic accidents. Researchers are exploring how intelligent vehicles should communicate with the environment, other vehicles, and road users. This study explores the impact of social information communication on traffic safety and efficiency at intersections through vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication. The research examines how these factors influence drivers' decision-making and cooperative behavior by incorporating social value orientation (SVO) and driving agent identity into V2V systems and automated vehicle (AV) decision-support systems. An experimental platform simulating intersection conflict scenarios was developed, and three studies involving 334 participants were conducted. The findings reveal that providing drivers with social information about opposing vehicles significantly promotes cooperative behavior and safer driving strategies. Specifically, the waiting rate for people facing proself vehicles (Mean = 0.22) is significantly higher than when facing prosocial vehicles (Mean = 0.79). When SVO is unknown, the waiting rate is around 0.5. Participants behaved more waiting when confronted with an AV than human-driven vehicles. With AV recommendations based on SVO, participants' final waiting rate increases as the recommended waiting rate increases. The optimal recommended waiting rate for AV is most acceptable when it matches the average waiting rate of the other vehicle. This research underscores the importance of integrating social information into V2V communication to improve road safety, aiding in designing automated decision-making strategies for AV and enhancing user satisfaction.

摘要

道路使用者之间缺乏沟通会降低交通效率,并导致交通事故等安全问题。研究人员正在探索智能车辆应如何与环境、其他车辆和道路使用者进行通信。本研究通过车对车(V2V)通信探讨了社会信息通信对交叉口交通安全和效率的影响。该研究通过将社会价值取向(SVO)和驾驶代理身份纳入 V2V 系统和自动驾驶(AV)决策支持系统,研究了这些因素如何影响驾驶员的决策和合作行为。开发了一个模拟交叉口冲突场景的实验平台,并进行了三项涉及 334 名参与者的研究。研究结果表明,向驾驶员提供有关对向车辆的社会信息可显著促进合作行为和更安全的驾驶策略。具体来说,面对自利车辆的等待率(Mean=0.22)明显高于面对亲社会车辆的等待率(Mean=0.79)。当 SVO 未知时,等待率约为 0.5。与人类驾驶车辆相比,参与者在面对 AV 时表现出更多的等待行为。随着基于 SVO 的 AV 建议,参与者的最终等待率随着建议等待率的增加而增加。当推荐的等待率与另一辆车的平均等待率相匹配时,AV 的最佳推荐等待率最被接受。本研究强调了将社会信息纳入 V2V 通信以提高道路安全的重要性,有助于设计自动驾驶决策策略并提高用户满意度。

相似文献

1
Wait or Pass? Promoting intersection's cooperation via identifying vehicle's social behavior.等待还是通过识别车辆的社会行为来促进交叉口的合作?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107724. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107724. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?辅助驾驶行为是否会导致与未配备车辆驾驶员的安全关键相遇?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt A):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Implicit intention communication as a design opportunity for automated vehicles: Understanding drivers' interpretation of vehicle trajectory at narrow passages.内隐意图沟通作为自动驾驶车辆的设计机会:理解驾驶员在狭窄通道中对车辆轨迹的解释。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Aug;173:106691. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106691. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
4
What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?当与共享空间中的全自动道路运输系统交互时,VRU 需要哪些外部呈现的信息?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
5
Investigating Implicit and Explicit Communication of Highly Automated Vehicles in Japan: How do Light-band eHMIs affect Pedestrians' Willingness to Cross, Trust and Perceived Safety?调查日本高度自动化车辆的隐性和显性沟通:光带 eHMI 如何影响行人和穿越意愿、信任和感知安全?
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Nov;207:107719. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107719. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
6
Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.通过动作进行交流——自动驾驶车辆运动在道路瓶颈场景中协商通行权的适用性。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Sep;95:103438. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103438. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Investigating the safety and operational benefits of mixed traffic environments with different automated vehicle market penetration rates in the proximity of a driveway on an urban arterial.研究在城市主干道靠近私人车道的地方,不同自动化车辆市场渗透率的混合交通环境下的安全性和运行效益。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105982. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105982. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
8
Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.量化自动驾驶车辆和智能道路部署对中国道路安全的影响:一项国家级建模研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054069.
9
Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.混合交通中的驾驶员-自动驾驶车辆交互:交互类型和驾驶员的驾驶风格。
Hum Factors. 2024 Feb;66(2):544-561. doi: 10.1177/00187208221088358. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication to Improve Traffic Safety in Sand-dust Environment.利用车对车通信提高沙尘环境下的交通安全。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1165. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041165.