Suppr超能文献

FLOT与DCF方案作为胃癌围手术期治疗的比较

The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.

作者信息

Uçar Gökhan, Sekmek Serhat, Karahan İrfan, Ergün Yakup, İsak Özlem Aydın, Tunç Sezai, Doğan Mutlu, Gürler Fatih, Bayram Doğan, Açıkgöz Yusuf, Esen Selin Aktürk, Civelek Burak, Köş Fahriye Tuğba, Bal Öznur, Algın Efnan, Eren Tülay, İmamoğlu Gökşen İnanç, Urakçı Zuhat, Yazıcı Ozan, Özdemir Nuriye, Uncu Doğan

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Medical Oncology, Antalya City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Oncology. 2025;103(2):128-133. doi: 10.1159/000540517. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.

摘要

引言

局部区域性胃癌仍是一个严重问题,围手术期治疗可能会提高治疗成功率。研究了不同的治疗方案。本研究旨在比较氟尿嘧啶-亚叶酸钙-奥沙利铂-多西他赛(FLOT)方案和多西他赛-顺铂-氟尿嘧啶(DCF)方案的疗效。

方法

一项回顾性多中心研究评估了局部区域性胃癌患者。共有240例患者(137例接受DCF方案,103例接受FLOT方案)。比较了生存率。

结果

两组的人口统计学特征相似,但时间段不同。FLOT组的病理完全缓解率为7.8%,而DCF组没有。FLOT组的无病生存期比DCF组长(分别为未达到中位数 - 13.94个月)。中位总生存期相似(30.9个月对37.8个月),但中位随访时间影响了分析。FLOT组36个月的生存率为63%,DCF组为40%(对数秩检验;p = 0.015)。

结论

FLOT方案在缓解率和生存率方面优于DCF方案。DCF是一种既往的治疗方法。FLOT治疗需要长期随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验