Xue Jingchuan, Lin Yiling, Zhao Daoming, Kannan Kurunthachalam
Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12237, United States.
Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Quality Improvement and Ecological Restoration for Watersheds, Institute of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 1;949:175090. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175090. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
Benzothiazoles (BTHs) and benzotriazoles (BTRs) are widely used in various consumer products. However, their occurrence and fate in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States remain poorly understood. In this study, wastewater and sludge samples were collected from two WWTPs from the Albany area of New York State (WWTP and WWTP) and the concentrations of three BTH derivatives (BTH, 2-OH-BTH, and 2-Me-S-BTH) and five BTR derivatives (1-OH-BTR, XTR, 4-OH-BTR, TTR, and BTR) were determined. The geometric mean (GM) concentrations of Σ(BTHs) and Σ(BTRs) in influent were in the range of 7550-8690 and 4590-6240 ng/L, whereas those in effluent were 6650-7150 and 4620-6800 ng/L, respectively. In the influent of two WWTPs, BTH, BTR, and TTR were identified as the major chemicals at respective GM concentrations of 8440, 4200, and 1280 ng/L in WWTP, and 7300, 1180, and 2090 ng/L in WWTP. The removal efficiencies of BTHs and BTRs following activated sludge treatment were < 80 %, and Σ(BTRs) showed a negative removal in both WWTPs. The respective mass loadings of Σ(BTHs) and Σ(BTRs) were 7240 and 5200 mg/d/1000 individuals in WWTP, and 3530 and 2140 mg/d/1000 individuals in WWTP. The environmental emissions of Σ(BTHs) and Σ(BTRs) from WWTP discharges were estimated at 3110-6030 and 2160-5700 mg/d/1000 individuals, respectively. Overall, BTHs and BTRs are not efficiently removed in WWTP processes. This study provides baseline information regarding the loading, fate, and discharge of BTHs and BTRs from WWTPs in the USA.
苯并噻唑(BTHs)和苯并三唑(BTRs)广泛应用于各类消费品中。然而,它们在美国污水处理厂(WWTPs)中的存在情况及归宿仍知之甚少。在本研究中,从纽约州奥尔巴尼地区的两座污水处理厂(污水处理厂1和污水处理厂2)采集了废水和污泥样本,并测定了三种BTH衍生物(BTH、2-OH-BTH和2-Me-S-BTH)以及五种BTR衍生物(1-OH-BTR、XTR、4-OH-BTR、TTR和BTR)的浓度。进水口处Σ(BTHs)和Σ(BTRs)的几何平均(GM)浓度范围分别为7550 - 8690 ng/L和4590 - 6240 ng/L,而出水口处分别为6650 - 7150 ng/L和4620 - 6800 ng/L。在两座污水处理厂的进水口,BTH、BTR和TTR被确定为主要化学物质,在污水处理厂1中各自的GM浓度分别为8440、4200和1280 ng/L,在污水处理厂2中分别为7300、1180和2090 ng/L。活性污泥处理后BTHs和BTRs的去除效率<80%,并且在两座污水处理厂中Σ(BTRs)均呈现负去除。污水处理厂1中Σ(BTHs)和Σ(BTRs)各自的质量负荷分别为7240和5200 mg/d/1000人,污水处理厂2中分别为3530和2140 mg/d/1000人。污水处理厂排放的Σ(BTHs)和Σ(BTRs)对环境的排放量估计分别为3110 - 6030和2160 - 5700 mg/d/1000人。总体而言,BTHs和BTRs在污水处理厂工艺中未能有效去除。本研究提供了有关美国污水处理厂中BTHs和BTRs的负荷、归宿及排放的基线信息。