Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
Department of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 30;14(7):e085763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085763.
The objective was to analyse the associations of intensive care unit (ICU) and high care unit (HCU) organisational structure on in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis in Japan's acute care hospitals.
Multicentre cross-sectional study.
Patients with sepsis aged ≥18 years who received critical care in acute care hospitals throughout Japan between April 2018 and March 2019 were identified using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB).
None.
10 968 patients with sepsis were identified. ICUs were categorised into three groups: type 1 ICUs (fulfilling stringent staffing criteria such as experienced intensivists and high nurse-to-patient ratios), type 2 ICUs (less stringent criteria) and HCUs (least stringent criteria).
The study's primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to examine the impact of ICU/HCU groups on in-hospital mortality.
We analysed 2411 patients (178 hospitals) in the type 1 ICU group, 3653 patients (422 hospitals) in the type 2 ICU group and 4904 patients (521 hospitals) in the HCU group. When compared with the type 1 ICU group, the adjusted HRs for in-hospital mortality were 1.12 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.21) for the type 2 ICU group and 1.17 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.26) for the HCU group.
ICUs that fulfil more stringent staffing criteria were associated with lower in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis than HCUs. Differences in organisational structure may have an association with outcomes in patients with sepsis, and this was observed by the NDB.
分析重症监护病房(ICU)和高护理病房(HCU)组织结构与日本急性护理医院脓毒症患者院内死亡率的关系。
多中心横断面研究。
使用日本国民健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库(NDB),确定 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月期间在日本各地急性护理医院接受重症监护的年龄≥18 岁的脓毒症患者。
无。
确定了 10968 例脓毒症患者。将 ICU 分为三组:满足严格人员配备标准的 1 型 ICU(如经验丰富的重症监护医师和高护士与患者比例)、2 型 ICU(较宽松的标准)和 HCU(最宽松的标准)。
本研究的主要观察指标为院内死亡率。采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析评估 ICU/HCU 组对院内死亡率的影响。
我们分析了 1 型 ICU 组的 2411 例患者(178 家医院)、2 型 ICU 组的 3653 例患者(422 家医院)和 HCU 组的 4904 例患者(521 家医院)。与 1 型 ICU 组相比,2 型 ICU 组和 HCU 组的院内死亡率调整后的 HR 分别为 1.12(95%CI 1.04 至 1.21)和 1.17(95%CI 1.08 至 1.26)。
与 HCU 相比,满足更严格人员配备标准的 ICU 与脓毒症患者的院内死亡率降低相关。组织结构的差异可能与脓毒症患者的结局有关,NDB 观察到了这一点。