Suppr超能文献

加速康复外科下远端胃癌切除术与全胃切除术治疗胃癌的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。

Short-term outcomes of distal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for gastric cancer under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University & Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68787-9.

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been used safely and effectively in patients with gastric cancer. Our aim was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of total gastrectomy (TG) versus distal gastrectomy (DG) for gastric cancer under ERAS. A prospectively collected database of 1349 patients with gastric cancer who underwent TG or DG between January 2016 and September 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was used at a ratio of 1:1 to reduce confounding effects, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was overall postoperative complications (POCs). Secondary outcomes comprised time to bowel function recovery, postoperative hospital stay, mortality, and 30-day readmission rate. Of 1349 identified patients, 296 (21.9%) experienced overall POCs. Before matching, multivariable analysis revealed that age, body mass index, diabetes, operation time, and extent of gastrectomy were independent risk factors for overall POCs. After matching, each group comprised 495 patients, and no significant differences were observed between the groups for all parameters except tumor location. Compared with TG, DG was associated with significantly earlier days to first flatus and to eating a soft diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.05). The incidence of overall- and severe POCs (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) in the TG group was significantly higher vs. the DG group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of days to eating a liquid diet, or mortality and 30-day readmission rates between the groups (P > 0.05). In the subgroup analysis for middle-third gastric cancer, the TG group experienced higher rates of overall- and severe POCs, with a longer postoperative hospital stay. Compared with DG, patients who underwent TG had higher POC rates, slower recovery of bowel function, and longer duration of hospitalization under ERAS. Therefore, caution is needed when initiating early feeding for patients who undergo TG.

摘要

加速康复外科(ERAS)已被安全有效地应用于胃癌患者。我们旨在评估 ERAS 下胃癌全胃切除术(TG)与远端胃切除术(DG)的短期疗效。回顾性分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月期间 1349 例接受 TG 或 DG 的胃癌患者的前瞻性数据库。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配分析来减少混杂效应,并比较两组患者的围手术期临床结局。主要结局为总术后并发症(POC)。次要结局包括肠功能恢复时间、术后住院时间、死亡率和 30 天再入院率。在 1349 例患者中,296 例(21.9%)发生了总 POC。在匹配前,多变量分析显示年龄、体重指数、糖尿病、手术时间和胃切除术范围是总 POC 的独立危险因素。匹配后,每组各有 495 例患者,除肿瘤位置外,两组各参数之间无显著差异。与 TG 相比,DG 首次排气和开始软食的时间更早,术后住院时间更短(P<0.05)。TG 组总 POC 和严重 POC(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥IIIa)的发生率明显高于 DG 组(P<0.05)。两组开始进液的天数、死亡率和 30 天再入院率无显著差异(P>0.05)。在胃中三分之一胃癌的亚组分析中,TG 组的总 POC 和严重 POC 发生率更高,术后住院时间更长。与 DG 相比,接受 TG 的患者 POC 发生率更高,肠功能恢复更慢,ERAS 下住院时间更长。因此,对于接受 TG 的患者,开始早期喂养时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe6/11289314/814c4205ee61/41598_2024_68787_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验