• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保守或手术治疗骨盆脆性骨折患者的前瞻性随机对照试验研究方案。

Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Faculty of Health Science and Medicine of University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Jul 30;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08350-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08350-z
PMID:39080698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11287941/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis is rising. Whereas the treatment for FFP type I, III, and IV is clear, the optimal treatment for FFP type II remains a topic of discussion. Traditionally these fractures have been treated conservatively. However, there is a shift toward early surgical stabilization with percutaneous screw fixation to reduce pain and promote mobility in an already frail patient population. High-quality evidence, however, is lacking. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial was designed to compare conservative management to early percutaneous screw fixation in patients with type II fragility fractures.

METHODS

This is a monocenter randomized controlled trial. All patients with a FFP type II are screened for inclusion. After obtaining informed consent, patients are randomized between conservative management and surgical stabilization. Conservative management consists of early mobilization under guidance of physiotherapy and analgesics. Patients randomized for surgical treatment are operated on within 72 h using percutaneous screw fixation. The primary endpoint is mobility measured by the DEMMI score. Secondary endpoints are other dimensions of mobility, pain levels, quality of life, mortality, and morbidity. The total follow-up is 1 year. The required sample size is 68.

DISCUSSION

The present study aims to give certainty on the potential benefit of surgical treatment. Current literature on this topic remains unclear. According to the volume of FFP at the study hospital, we assume that the number of patients needed for this study is gathered within 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04744350. Registered on February 8, 2021.

摘要

背景

骨盆脆性骨折的发病率正在上升。虽然 FFP 型 I、III 和 IV 的治疗方法明确,但 FFP 型 II 的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。传统上,这些骨折采用保守治疗。然而,现在有一种趋势是早期采用经皮螺钉固定的手术稳定化治疗,以减轻疼痛并促进已经脆弱的患者群体的活动能力。然而,缺乏高质量的证据。因此,设计了一项随机临床试验,旨在比较保守治疗与早期经皮螺钉固定治疗 II 型脆性骨折患者的效果。

方法

这是一项单中心随机对照试验。所有 FFP 型 II 患者都进行了筛选以纳入研究。获得知情同意后,患者在保守治疗和手术稳定化之间进行随机分组。保守治疗包括在物理治疗和镇痛的指导下早期活动。随机接受手术治疗的患者在 72 小时内进行经皮螺钉固定手术。主要终点是通过 DEMMI 评分测量的活动能力。次要终点是其他活动能力维度、疼痛水平、生活质量、死亡率和发病率。总随访时间为 1 年。所需的样本量为 68 例。

讨论

本研究旨在确定手术治疗的潜在益处。目前关于这个主题的文献仍然不清楚。根据研究医院的 FFP 量,我们假设这项研究需要的患者数量可以在 2 年内收集到。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04744350. 注册于 2021 年 2 月 8 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60bc/11287941/e2ea2284b4b1/13063_2024_8350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60bc/11287941/cf6930050d4e/13063_2024_8350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60bc/11287941/e2ea2284b4b1/13063_2024_8350_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60bc/11287941/cf6930050d4e/13063_2024_8350_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60bc/11287941/e2ea2284b4b1/13063_2024_8350_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.保守或手术治疗骨盆脆性骨折患者的前瞻性随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jul 30;25(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08350-z.
2
Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP).前瞻性评估影响骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)治疗策略和结果的关键因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):3243-3256. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01887-1. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
3
Internal fixation of radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis: a case series.骨盆放射性脆弱性骨折的内固定:病例系列。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):865-871. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04358-9. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
[Fragility fractures of the pelvis].[骨盆脆性骨折]
Unfallchirurg. 2019 Jun;122(6):469-482. doi: 10.1007/s00113-019-0643-7.
5
Fragility fractures of the pelvis: should they be fixed?骨盆脆性骨折:是否应进行固定?
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(2):101-12.
6
[Minimally invasive stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis with transsacral bar and retrograde transpubic screw].经骶骨棒和逆行耻骨螺钉微创稳定骨盆脆性骨折
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Apr;34(2):153-171. doi: 10.1007/s00064-022-00763-w. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Midterm follow-up of elderly patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis: A prospective cohort-study comparing operative and non-operative treatment according to a therapeutic algorithm.老年骨盆脆弱性骨折患者的中期随访:根据治疗算法比较手术和非手术治疗的前瞻性队列研究。
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):496-505. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.044. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
8
Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality. A single institution experience.骨盆脆弱性骨折的手术治疗与死亡率降低有关。单机构经验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253408. eCollection 2021.
9
In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up.用于治疗骨盆脆性骨折的内置聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强骶髂螺钉:一项为期1年随访的前瞻性观察研究
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0330-y.
10
Progress of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis: An observational study.骨盆脆性骨折不稳定性的研究进展:一项观察性研究。
Injury. 2019 Nov;50(11):1966-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.038. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Depressive Symptoms Can Attenuate Rehabilitation Effects in Fracture Patients.抑郁症状会削弱骨折患者的康复效果。
Prog Rehabil Med. 2025 Jul 24;10:20250018. doi: 10.2490/prm.20250018. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship between depression improvement and activities of daily living recovery in patients with fractures.骨折患者抑郁改善与日常生活活动恢复之间的关系
PCN Rep. 2025 Jun 24;4(2):e70139. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70139. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Transfusion Risk Factors in Low-Energy Pelvic Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of minimally invasive internal fixation versus nonoperative conservative management of pelvic ring fragility fractures and the elderly.回顾性分析微创内固定与非手术保守治疗骨盆环脆弱性骨折和老年患者的疗效。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Feb 15;18(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03591-1.
2
The Quality of Life, Patient Satisfaction and Rehabilitation in Patients With a Low Energy Fracture-Part III of an Observational Study.低能量骨折患者的生活质量、患者满意度与康复——一项观察性研究的第三部分
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Oct 20;12:21514593211046407. doi: 10.1177/21514593211046407. eCollection 2021.
3
低能量骨盆骨折的输血风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Jun 13;16:21514593251351557. doi: 10.1177/21514593251351557. eCollection 2025.
Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality. A single institution experience.
骨盆脆弱性骨折的手术治疗与死亡率降低有关。单机构经验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253408. eCollection 2021.
4
Fear of Falling, Recurrence of Falls, and Quality of Life in Patients with a Low Energy Fracture-Part II of an Observational Study.跌倒恐惧、跌倒复发与低能量骨折患者的生活质量——一项观察性研究的第二部分。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 7;57(6):584. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060584.
5
Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis may not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment.经皮手术治疗骨盆脆弱性骨折与非手术治疗相比,总体并发症发生率可能不会增加。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3729-3735. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01660-w. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
6
Progressive instability of bilateral sacral fragility fractures in osteoporotic bone: a retrospective analysis of X-ray, CT, and MRI datasets from 78 cases.骨质疏松性骨双侧骶骨脆弱性骨折的进行性不稳定:78 例 X 射线、CT 和 MRI 数据集的回顾性分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):11-19. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01480-4. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
7
Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients.老年患者骨盆脆性骨折的功能治疗策略。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01484-0. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
8
Early Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: A Propensity-Matched Multicenter Study.早期手术与非手术治疗骨盆脆弱性骨折:一项倾向匹配的多中心研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33(11):e410-e415. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001584.
9
In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up.用于治疗骨盆脆性骨折的内置聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强骶髂螺钉:一项为期1年随访的前瞻性观察研究
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0330-y.
10
Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.骨盆脆性骨折的微创手术治疗
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Sept-Oct;112(5):524-537. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.5.524.