Do Social Deprivation and Surgical Volume Influence Outcomes Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation?

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures account for nearly 25% of fractures in adults, with a trend toward operative fixation. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between surgeon and hospital volume with complications following distal radius fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009 to 2015. Outpatient claims were identified for distal radius fractures and surgery. The facility and surgeon's identifier were used to calculate annual procedure volume. The risk for infection, carpal tunnel surgery, and revision/hardware removal was analyzed, and Social Deprivation Index (SDI) was linked to each patient. Patient demographics and rate of complications were compared across hospital and physician volume.

RESULTS

A total of 14 748 patients were included, finding Federal and self-pay insurance associated with low-volume (LV) facility care and private insurance with high-volume (HV) facilities. The SDI for patients treated by LV surgeons and hospitals was significantly higher compared with HV providers. Low-volume facilities and surgeons had a higher 3-month risk of infection requiring reoperation. High-volume facilities were less likely to treat Hispanic patients, those with comorbidities, higher SDI, and with Federal or self-pay insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated by LV surgeons and facilities had a higher risk of infection requiring surgery within 3 months than those treated by HV providers. Low-volume facilities were more likely to treat patients who were Hispanic, Federally insured, and with comorbidities and higher SDI than HV facilities, increasing their risk for disadvantaged care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.