Institution of Endocrinology, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 197341 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Faculty Therapy Department, Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, 197022 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2024 Jul 24;29(7):265. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2907265.
Acute and chronic brain damage in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) determines the need to investigate the neuroprotective potential of glucose-lowering drugs. The purpose was to directly compare the neuroprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) with different duration of action and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in type 2 diabetic rats with and without stroke.
DM was modelled using high-fat diet and nicotinamide+streptozotocin protocol. The following groups (n = 15 each) were formed: DM without treatment, treatment with liraglutide, dulaglutide, canagliflozin as well as control group without DM and treatment. After 8 weeks, 10 rats from each group underwent middle cerebral artery occlusion. In the reperfusion period neurological deficit, neuroglial damage markers and brain necrosis were evaluated. Brain slices from the remaining 5 animals in each group were histologically examined for microglial activation and neuronal damage.
Brain damage was similar in "DM" and "Control" (17.53 [14.23; 26.58] and 15.87 [13.40; 22.68] % of total brain volume, respectively). All study drugs diminished damage volume comparing with "DM" and "Control" whereas the necrosis volume in "DM+Liraglutide" was smaller than in "DM+Canagliflozin" and did not significantly differ from "DM+Dulaglutide" (2.9 [1.83; 4.71], 6.17 [3.88; 8.88] and 4.57 [3.27; 7.90] %). The neurological deficit was more prominent in "DM" than in "Control", while all the drugs demonstrated similar positive effect. Neurofilament light chains (NLC) did not differ between "DM" and "Control". Dulaglutide and canagliflozin caused a marked decrease in NLC. Protein S100BB level was similar in "DM" and "Control". Liraglutide caused the largest S100BB decrease, while canagliflozin did not influence it. In chronic brain ischaemia, all drugs increased the number of normal neurons, but GLP-1RAs had a more pronounced effect. DM was accompanied by increased number of activated microglial cells in Cornu Ammonis (CA)1 hippocampal region. Both GLP-1RAs reduced the number of Iba-1-positive cells, with dulaglutide being more effective than liraglutide, whereas canagliflozin did not affect this parameter.
GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2i have neuroprotective properties against acute and chronic brain damage in diabetic rats, although the infarct-limiting effect of GLP-1RAs may be more pronounced. GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2i exert their protective effects by directly influencing neuronal survival, whereas GLP-1RAs also affect microglia.
2 型糖尿病(DM)的急性和慢性脑损伤决定了需要研究降血糖药物的神经保护潜力。目的是直接比较具有不同作用持续时间的胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 抑制剂(SGLT-2i)在伴有和不伴有中风的 2 型糖尿病大鼠中的神经保护作用。
使用高脂肪饮食和烟酰胺+链脲佐菌素方案建立 DM 模型。形成以下组(每组 15 只):未经治疗的 DM、利拉鲁肽、度拉鲁肽、卡格列净治疗、无 DM 且未经治疗的对照组。8 周后,每组中的 10 只大鼠接受大脑中动脉闭塞。在再灌注期间评估神经功能缺损、神经胶质损伤标志物和脑坏死。每组其余 5 只动物的脑切片进行小胶质细胞激活和神经元损伤的组织学检查。
“DM”和“对照”组的脑损伤相似(分别为 17.53 [14.23;26.58] 和 15.87 [13.40;22.68] %的脑总体积)。与“DM”和“对照”相比,所有研究药物均减少了损伤体积,而“DM+利拉鲁肽”的坏死体积小于“DM+卡格列净”且与“DM+度拉鲁肽”无显著差异(2.9 [1.83;4.71]、6.17 [3.88;8.88]和 4.57 [3.27;7.90] %)。“DM”中的神经功能缺损比“对照”更明显,而所有药物均表现出相似的积极作用。神经丝轻链(NLC)在“DM”和“对照”之间无差异。度拉鲁肽和卡格列净导致 NLC 明显下降。S100BB 蛋白水平在“DM”和“对照”之间相似。利拉鲁肽导致 S100BB 下降最大,而卡格列净则没有影响。在慢性脑缺血中,所有药物均增加了正常神经元的数量,但 GLP-1RAs 的作用更明显。DM 伴有 Cornu Ammonis(CA)1 海马区激活的小胶质细胞数量增加。两种 GLP-1RAs 均减少 Iba-1 阳性细胞的数量,其中度拉鲁肽比利拉鲁肽更有效,而卡格列净则没有影响该参数。
GLP-1RAs 和 SGLT-2i 对糖尿病大鼠的急性和慢性脑损伤具有神经保护作用,尽管 GLP-1RAs 的梗死限制作用可能更为明显。GLP-1RAs 和 SGLT-2i 通过直接影响神经元存活来发挥其保护作用,而 GLP-1RAs 还影响小胶质细胞。